Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Loose management in universities does more harm than good.
Loose management in universities does more harm than good.
The reasons why loose management in universities does more harm than good are as follows.

First, loose management will lead to the loss of college students' awareness of rules. Undeniably, loose education can promote the personality development of college students, but directly implementing loose education after college students have just stepped out of exam-oriented education will lead to college students' inability to adapt to college life, which will lead to low learning efficiency.

Social management will only be stricter than that of universities, while college students in slack management will pay less attention to rules. Although loose management conforms to their personality development, it will be more difficult for them to adapt to society when they step into society. Therefore, we believe that loose management is not conducive to the school to provide more talents for the country and society.

Second, loose management requires higher consciousness of the managed, which is not conducive to the development of most students. According to the 28 Law invented by the Italian economist Valledo, it tells us that in this world, excellent people account for 20% and mediocre people account for 80%.

So do college students. 20% of college students have a strong sense of self-discipline, and they can freely allocate time in this relaxed environment to improve themselves and become better, while the remaining 80% of college students can't make good use of their time to improve themselves because of lack of self-discipline, and may even neglect themselves.

Undeniably, loose management can really make outstanding talents better, but it makes mediocre people a stepping stone. The original intention of education is to improve all students in an all-round way, so loose management goes against the original intention of education. Therefore, we believe that loose management is not conducive to the school to provide more talents for the country and society.

Thirdly, the practice result of loose management is uncertain. Undeniably, loose management has increased the time of college students, but the time available may not necessarily increase. For example, you do have a lot of free time on weekends than on your normal school days, but it is uncertain that you may not spend as much time on weekends as on your normal school days.