Support this kind of reverse education. ? The essence of "reverse parenting" is reverse education, which was originally an educational method, referring to the way of provocation or irony to resolve the resistance of the educational object and promote its epiphany, so as to achieve the educational purpose. ? First, this method is more suitable for parents' corrective and persuasive education of their children. ? Under the premise of grasping the degree, it is a good way to let children choose to "educate" themselves with their own behaviors. Some children go to school in the morning and lack tension, often because their parents are in a hurry. If parents are slower, after being late once or twice, the children may be more anxious. It can be seen that in this way, letting children suffer some losses and reflect on their own shortcomings is helpful to make changes actively, which is more useful than parents blindly preaching. ? Second, the orientation of "reverse parenting" should be a special way of education. ? When a person is young, he knows nothing about everything in the world and needs the protection and education of his parents. "Reverse parenting" can exercise children's independent ability and cultivate their empathy ability, but it needs to proceed from reality, not mechanically, and be used flexibly according to children's different personality characteristics. ? Third, "reverse parenting" should be based on seeking common ground while reserving differences. ? Everyone has his own values and limitations, and children are no exception. Parents should listen to their children's opinions and give due respect to their children's alternative demands that conform to the trend of the times and have positive significance. This is the best parenting education. However, any move has shortcomings. If "reverse parenting" is used too often, it is likely to lead to the lack of children's psychological growth. Children may look at their parents' faces too much, suppress their inner feelings, and easily develop a likable personality. Therefore, "reverse parenting" also needs to be properly handled, and positive guidance cannot be neglected. Only by playing "combination boxing" well can children grow up healthily and happily. ? Fourth, reverse education is not bad, but it needs to be enough to grasp the scale. There are some detours, we can't give them a ride, so let them feel it for themselves. We just need to be with them and leave the rest to the children to experience. ? In short, children's personality characteristics are varied, and family education methods should be varied, and the right one is the best. According to the specific situation of children, we should pay attention to active guidance and companionship, and properly use "reverse parenting" to raise better children.

I don't think this kind of education is a good way for children. Although judging from the child's reaction, the mother's education is usually very successful, otherwise the child will not resolutely let her pay. However, the mother of a five-year-old child should not turn herself into a negative textbook. If her mother leaves a bad image in the children's mind in the future, there is no way to tell them what she did and what she did wrong. The mother made herself a negative example to make the children feel that their behavior was wrong, but the child has already defined her as an unruly person in this matter, otherwise the child will not resolutely let her pay. As a result of this test, it is certain that their family education is very good for their children, or that they have grown into a kind-hearted and principled good child. However, judging from the long-term education mode, a negative and unruly person is not a person who is not very successful and not very good. Then educate children to meet other things in the future and educate them slowly according to their own principles. Do children have doubts about some behaviors of their mothers? After all, the child is only five years old, and there are still many problems to face with you in the future. At the age of five, children's cognition is limited. When encountering other things in the future, mothers need to set an example to educate their children and tell them what is right and wrong. So today's behavior will leave the seeds of doubt on the impression of the mother in the children's hearts. Then in the future, if the child's mother does something wrong, she will tell the child that it is wrong. If you give an example yourself, will the child think that what the mother did is right? Because today, under the education mode of pretending to escape, what the mother left in the children's hearts is not what she did, but the correct impression. Therefore, if we educate our children from our own perspective in the future, it may not be so convincing for children. So I think it is wrong for mothers to educate their children like this. At least when their children are 5 years old, they should not pretend to escape from order by their own actions. This method will be counterproductive.