Legal analysis: If the public security organ makes mistakes in law enforcement, it shall, according to the respective responsibilities of the people's police in handling cases, distinguish different situations and investigate the responsibilities of the case approver, reviewer, case handler, appraiser and other directly responsible personnel respectively. If the undertaker, the auditor and the approver all make mistakes in law enforcement due to intention or negligence, they shall bear the responsibilities respectively, and the approver shall bear the main responsibility. In the process of examination and approval, the approver changes or does not adopt the correct opinions of the case handlers and auditors, resulting in law enforcement mistakes, and the approver shall bear all the responsibilities. In violation of the prescribed procedures, the person directly responsible shall bear the responsibility for the fault of law enforcement caused by ultra vires.

Legal basis: Provisions on the Investigation of Law Enforcement Mistakes by the People's Police of Public Security Organs Article 6 When performing their duties, the people's police of public security organs shall be investigated for law enforcement faults in any of the following circumstances:

(a) in violation of the provisions of the law, the criminal and administrative cases that should be filed or revoked are not filed or revoked, and the cases that should not be filed or revoked are not filed or revoked;

(2) Practicing fraud, extorting confessions by torture, deceiving confessions, inducing confessions or forcing witnesses to testify, or making major mistakes or omissions in the inquest, inspection and appraisal, resulting in improper handling of the case;

(three) due to the subjective fault of the case handler, the main criminal facts of the case are wrong, and the procuratorate refuses to approve the arrest, does not prosecute or the people's court decides not to be guilty;

(four) the arrest should be reported but not reported, resulting in the procuratorate arresting more major criminal suspects when examining and approving the arrest;

(five) reported reeducation through labor and juvenile detention education, due to the subjective fault of the case handlers, resulting in the main facts of the case error, the examination and approval authority or the relevant departments shall not approve;

(six) due to the subjective fault of the case handlers, the main facts of the case are wrong or the legal procedures are seriously violated, and the specific administrative act is revoked by the people's court or the reconsideration organ;

(seven) to take criminal detention, bail pending trial, residential surveillance and other criminal compulsory measures. Mishandling a person who has no criminal facts or no evidence to prove that he is suspected of a major crime, or handling a case beyond the statutory time limit;

(eight) illegal detention, fines, revocation of permits and licenses, confiscation of property and other administrative penalties or reeducation through labor, juvenile detention, education and other measures to restrict personal freedom;

(nine) in violation of the law, apply for medical parole, execution;

(ten) in violation of the law, take compulsory measures such as seizure, seizure and freezing of property, or collect property and fees in violation of state regulations;

(eleven) in violation of the law, the use of police equipment and weapons, the circumstances are bad or cause serious consequences;

(twelve) in violation of the law, hinder the parties from exercising their legitimate rights such as appeal, accusation, hearing, reconsideration and litigation, and the circumstances are bad or cause serious consequences;

(thirteen) do not perform the duties of handling cases, or hinder the public security organs in different places to handle cases according to law, and the circumstances are bad or cause serious consequences;

(fourteen) the wrong execution or refusal to execute the legally effective criminal, administrative judgment, reconsideration decision and other decisions and orders to correct illegal acts, resulting in serious consequences;

(fifteen) refusing or delaying the performance of statutory duties, resulting in serious consequences;

(sixteen) other intentional or negligent violations of laws, regulations and rules, should be investigated for law enforcement fault.