Another teacher questioned in his answer: the honorary certificate of teaching in rural areas for 30 years cannot be used as the performance material and honorary material for professional title evaluation. Without any material rewards, an old-age card can also take the bus for free. Is the gold content of this certificate issued by the Ministry of Education too low?
In fact, I have a certificate like this, which has been in the drawer for several years. If I hadn't seen this topic on the internet, I almost forgot that I still have such a certificate, because I haven't used it since I got it back. Other certificates should be taken out as performance materials when evaluating professional titles and evaluating the best, and only it has been lying there quietly.
I remember a few years ago, I was very excited to hear that the Ministry of Education was going to issue certificates to teachers who had been teaching in rural areas for 30 years. I feel that I have not forgotten my persistence for so many years, and I even have some luck in getting the certificate. The examination and approval of issuing certificates is quite strict. Writing applications, adjusting files and checking problems make us more convinced that this is a heavy honor.
After months of waiting, the certificate was issued, and no grand ceremony was held as expected, but the principal returned to school with a lot of materials when he received the teaching AIDS. I rummaged through the pile of materials myself and found a bright red cover, golden characters and a bright red seal of the Ministry of Education. After teaching for so many years, this is the first time to get such a high honorary certificate, so I am naturally very happy.
Actually, it's nothing. Then, the certificate is just a certificate, which is of no use except to prove that you have been teaching in the countryside for 30 years. I remember that there is a hard condition when evaluating and hiring senior titles, and there must be an honorary certificate at or above the county level. I handed in this honorary certificate issued by the Ministry of Education, thinking that this level was high enough, but it was not recognized. Not only that, but even the evaluation is not recognized, and the annual assessment cannot be used as a basis. So I can only put it on hold. Occasionally, when I was sorting out the drawers, I found that there was such a certificate, and I could recall the excitement of getting the certificate at that time.
I think the original intention of the education department to issue this certificate is definitely to commend and encourage educators who stick to the countryside in this way. I hope rural teachers can settle down and do a good job in education, and I also hope to set an example for young rural teachers. But what is the effect? Rural teachers are really a little green and yellow now. The older generation of middle school teachers and students are facing retirement, and young teachers can't go down and stay.
This year, Jiangxi once again recruited more than 6,000 normal students for junior high school graduates to supplement rural teachers' posts. The admission scores of oriented normal students are lower than those of key high schools, and the admission scores of boys are even lower than those of ordinary high schools. Are these children qualified for teaching after five years of normal education? Judging from the situation in recent years, young teachers in rural areas have changed in batches like merry-go-round. If rural education wants to retain talents, I'm afraid it can't just rely on a certificate of honor. Face? Do you need some more? Lizi?