The construction of new countryside in China is in full swing, the infrastructure of new countryside is changing with each passing day, the streets are wider, the street lamps are on, the tap water comes into the home, the closed-circuit television is connected to the network, and the classrooms of adult vocational and technical schools are also built. With the great attention of governments at all levels, these "hardware" parts can be completed in just a few years. However, as the "software" part of new rural construction, the improvement of farmers' comprehensive quality needs long-term efforts of vocational and technical education. Among them, farmers' ideological quality, production concept, knowledge level and production technology level need to be improved urgently. Only by solving these problems can the "software" of farmers' comprehensive quality level adapt to the "hardware" of new rural infrastructure. It is the real meaning of building a new socialist countryside. Rural comprehensive middle schools have the responsibility and ability to undertake farmers' vocational and technical education. If we can arm the so-called "poor students" who have no hope of further study and are about to participate in agricultural production with modern agricultural technology, let them play their due role in rural construction and agricultural production. This is the fundamental purpose of comprehensively implementing the Party's educational policy, realizing that education serves economic construction and combines with productive labor. ? Based on my teaching major, I have done a lot of social surveys on the current situation of rural animal husbandry production, and after in-depth thinking and analysis. I think agricultural vocational and technical education has great potential in the construction of new countryside. I will discuss the present situation of rural agricultural production and the necessity and feasibility of developing agricultural vocational and technical education. ?

1? Present situation of rural production: the scientific and technological content in agricultural production is too low, and the comprehensive quality of farmers is low?

1? 1' s business philosophy is wrong: there is no sense of scale production, no long-term development plan, and no calm attitude towards market changes. For example, the site selection of farms shows that due to the lack of large-scale production awareness and long-term development planning, livestock and poultry pens are built in their own yards, resulting in a mixed pattern of people and animals that are evenly distributed in almost the whole village. As a result, it is difficult to prevent and control livestock and poultry diseases. It is impossible to cut off the route of transmission when it comes on, but once it comes on, it quickly develops into an explosive epidemic. At the same time, most farmers did not treat livestock manure harmlessly, which polluted the living environment. Scientific site selection, at least 500 meters away from residential areas, prohibiting off-site personnel and off-site vehicles from entering the scene and other epidemic prevention measures. Only in this way can it be conducive to the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases. It also gives people a clean living space; Another example is that farmers cannot calmly cope with market changes, and the phenomenon of "following the trend" is serious. When they saw a project "making money", they flocked to it and developed blindly, resulting in the abnormal development of the project industry. The market price of the product seriously exceeds the value of the product itself, forming a bubble economy. Once the market reversed, farmers rushed to give up the project, causing the market price to plummet. When the industry fell to the "bottom", it should have filled the "column" in time. Because the market is about to pick up, this is the law of market changes. When it is profitable, no one dares to run it. Taking the fluctuation range of piglet price from 220 yuan/Tou to 25 yuan/Tou as an example, it is enough to illustrate the problem. When the production of animal husbandry has experienced ups and downs, the biggest victims are farmers and breeders. However, this man-made economic loss is caused by farmers themselves.

1? 2 the technical level of feeding management is seriously backward?

1? 2? 1 Farmers lack knowledge of nutrition and feed: Farmers don't understand that animals need different nutrition at different growth stages. There are differences in different seasons. At what stage, feed with what nutritional ratio should be prepared. Because we can't prepare full-price feed, we can only buy concentrated feed because we can't use additive premix correctly. I don't know that at least the profits of 500 yuan are taken away by manufacturers and merchants per ton of concentrated feed. The concentrated feed also contains a certain amount of inferior protein feed raw materials; Such as excessive cottonseed cake, feather powder, etc. Protein's ideal index drops, and its quality is greatly reduced. Can not meet the nutritional needs of livestock and poultry growth and reproduction. Some cattle farmers don't understand the nutritional value of silage, which is too troublesome. Even the ready-made silage cellar is idle. However, the milk yield of dairy cows is not taken seriously. At present, the feed market is mixed. As a result, the farmers did not earn the money they should have earned; Excessive emulsion urging shortens the service life of dairy cows, and the iodine in milk exceeds the standard. ? (potential). ?

In short, teachers should try their best to practice new teaching concepts, change the traditional practice of focusing on results and developing students' physical fitness, so that students can master methods, cultivate sports awareness and pay attention to process; Change the traditional explanation, demonstration and practice into students' independent research and cooperative exchange learning; Change the traditional "standardized" exercises and encourage students to think and innovate. ?

2. In the process of practicing curriculum reform, I have my own thoughts on the following three issues?

2. 1 can skills learning be ignored by focusing on happy sports and autonomous cooperative inquiry learning? I don't think the classroom teaching in physical education class can be overwhelmed by vanity and rushing headlong into it. If we only pursue the beautiful and lively scenes in the classroom and emphasize the so-called "autonomy" while ignoring the teaching of motor skills, such a physical education class is tantamount to "innovative herding sheep"; Contradicting with the original intention of physical education curriculum reform. ?

2? 2 To what extent is the open physical education classroom teaching open? First of all, open physical education teaching is not unprincipled for students, and teachers should strengthen the "guiding" role in teaching. Secondly, open teaching is not only the affirmation and negation of students' "sticking to their own words", but also the guidance of students' acceptance and accommodation, a clear understanding of their "subject" status and tasks, full play to their sports enthusiasm and sports potential, and efficient possession of open content. ? 2? 3 How to understand the systematic problems of physical education learning? Do not deliberately pursue the system, nor do you not talk about the system. In physical education class, as long as it has a comprehensive effect on students' physical and mental development, sports that students are interested in and have good results can be used as curriculum content, which should reflect the diversity of curriculum content; But three learning steps should be set to deal with its project content-understanding, ability and ability. Understand: Know how to play. Will: Mastering knowledge, skills and rules. Energy: that is, the ability to exercise is improved. Vocational education in rural middle schools should serve the construction of new countryside.