First, it violates the "three regulations" to prevent judicial intervention.
Engaging in malpractices for selfish ends, bending the law or accepting the entrustment of others, illegally asking questions or intervening or intervening in judicial cases; Contact with parties, lawyers, special stakeholders and intermediary organizations in violation of regulations; Other issues that interfere with the "three provisions" of the judiciary.
Two, illegal business enterprises and spouses, children and their spouses engaged in business activities.
Procurators run enterprises through business; Working part-time in economic organizations, social organizations and other units in violation of regulations, or obtaining additional benefits such as wages, bonuses and allowances after being approved to work part-time; Using the influence of authority or position to help spouses, children, their spouses and other relatives engage in business activities; The procurator's spouse, children and their spouses are partners or founders of the law firm within the jurisdiction where the procurator works; Acting as an agent ad litem or defender within the jurisdiction of a public prosecutor, or providing other paid legal services to litigants.
Third, illegal participation in lending.
Procurators illegally participate in the operation of enterprises by others; Holding shares or securities of unlisted companies in violation of regulations; Illegal registration of companies abroad or investment in shares; Illegal participation in private lending, paid guarantees and other financial activities to obtain large returns; There are illegal economic exchanges such as illegal loans with the parties to the case and their close relatives or attorneys.
Four, the case is not established, the case is not investigated, and the responsibility is not investigated.
Reports, complaints and appeals to the masses should be accepted but not accepted; Failing to transfer the clues of judicial staff suspected of duty crimes in time, or failing to review them in time; The public security organ should file a case without filing it, and the supervision of filing it is not effective; Cases transferred by public security organs have been put on hold for a long time, and they have been delayed for a long time; Making a decision not to arrest a criminal suspect who should be arrested according to law, or making a decision not to prosecute a defendant who should be prosecuted according to law; In the stage of examination, arrest and prosecution, it is found that the crime is omitted or committed, and it is not prosecuted according to law; Failing to lodge a protest or put forward suggestions for retrial or procuratorial work in accordance with the law against the judgment or ruling that is really wrong; Failing to accept the clues of supervising civil and administrative cases of public interest litigation according to law, or failing to review and verify them in time after acceptance.
5. Illegal commutation, parole and temporary execution outside prison.
Inadequate supervision of the staff of the penalty-executing organs who declare "temporary reduction of leave" in violation of regulations; The executing organ shall apply for parole or temporary execution outside prison for the prisoner, but fails to apply for parole in time according to law, resulting in the death of the prisoner in the supervision place and other serious consequences. Inadequate supervision over commutation, parole or temporary execution outside prison of judges' illegal decisions; Inadequate supervision over the illegal approval of prison management organs and public security organs for temporary execution outside prison; Inadequate supervision of other entities and procedures that illegally obtain "temporary vacation reduction"; Procurators directly participate in "temporary vacation reduction" in violation of laws and regulations, or provide convenience or acquiescence for illegal acts; Procurators should find illegal "temporary holiday reduction" but fail to find it, or fail to correct it after finding it, or fail to follow up and supervise it after putting forward rectification opinions; If a criminal who is released on parole or temporarily executed outside prison is out of control, he should be found but not found, or his supervision is weak after he is found.
6. After leaving office, the public prosecutor illegally engaged in the profession of lawyer and acted as a judicial broker.
The former leading cadres violated the restrictive regulations on leaving office, served as agents ad litem or defenders as lawyers within three years after leaving office, and served as other personnel within two years after leaving office; After the public prosecutor leaves office, he acts as an agent ad litem or defender of the original unit in handling cases; Former leading cadres and prosecutors used their position and influence before leaving office to bridge the gap between the case undertaker and the parties and their relatives, trustees and lawyers, or accepted the entrustment of the parties and lawyers to interfere with the case in violation of regulations and make profits from it.
Seven, the spirit is not strong, the judicial style is not correct.
Work buck passing, buck passing, perfunctory; Judicial assistance and law popularization are not in place within the scope of performing duties; Failing to answer, accept or inform the matters within the scope of their functions and powers at one time; Failing to reply in time to letters and visits from the masses; Ask the parties to the case for a card; The management and use of buses are not standardized, and police cars are parked illegally.
Eight, the judicial policy of "less arrest and cautious prosecution" is not in place.
Without comprehensively considering and analyzing the conditions of arrest such as social danger, approving the arrest of cases that do not need to be arrested, and making a decision not to prosecute or withdraw the prosecution after approving the arrest; The case review is not strict, and the prosecution decision is made for cases with minor circumstances that should not be prosecuted, and the sentence is exempted after prosecution.
Nine, the court return rate of public prosecution cases is high.
The entity review was not careful and the case was not properly characterized, which led to the change of jurisdiction and was returned by the court; The court did not seriously examine the jurisdiction, withdrawal and other issues, and returned it on the grounds of changing jurisdiction or the need to withdraw the lawsuit; The defendant absconded and was returned by the court because the pre-litigation compulsory measures were improperly taken or changed in time; The handling period is too long and the legal interpretation is not in place, which leads to the defendant's slackness in litigation, inability to appear in court in time and being returned by the court; Failing to fulfill the obligation of review, the court still agrees to return the cases that do not meet the conditions for return.
Welcome the supervision of the masses and thank all sectors of society for their concern and support! Relevant opinions and suggestions can be reflected through the following channels.
Tel: 12309
E-mail: No.78 Nanxu Avenue, Zhenjiang City
Telephone calls are accepted at 9: 00- 12: 00 on weekdays, at 14: 00- 18: 00 in the afternoon, and the deadline for incoming letters and calls is June 15.