The student nutrition improvement plan is a health plan to implement the dining problem of rural compulsory education students since 20 1 1. The funds for students' nutritious meals mainly come from state financial subsidies. As a school teacher and 8 1 teacher, I have collectively "eaten" nutritious meals for more than a year without paying a penny. I don't know how the teachers who "eat" feel. Don't they feel afraid and ashamed?
8 1 A teacher in a school "eats" a student's nutritious meal, which is definitely not the "stealing" behavior of one or two teachers. What actually reflects is that school teachers collectively encroach on students' nutritional meal subsidies, which I think should be decided by the school. Who has the right to decide? Principals of the school, of course. Even greedy mouths openly extend to students' nutritious meals. As three principals or 865,438+0 teachers, what is the ethics of being a teacher?
Although according to the implementation method of nutritious meals for primary and secondary school students, in order to find and solve the problems and difficulties in canteen management in time, it is necessary for school principals or school administrators to take turns to accompany meals, but the caterers should pay their own expenses. Everyone who accompanies meals has to pay for their own meals, not to mention all 8 1 teachers in the school. In fact, 8 1 teacher's "nibbling" at students' nutritious meals did not happen at the beginning, but after the spring of 20 15, which shows that both school leaders and teachers know that students' nutritious meals belong to students only. Therefore, as far as teachers collectively "eat" students' nutritious meals, they have seriously violated the relevant regulations on students' nutritious meals since childhood and openly encroached on students' interests; Generally speaking, taking advantage of his position, he illegally misappropriated special state financial subsidies and "ate" them for more than a year. This is no longer a matter of accidental negligence, but a matter of suspected intention, not to mention that the amount recovered after such a long time has reached 10 thousand yuan, which is a serious condition for the crime of corruption.
At present, although the discipline inspection department at a higher level has actively intervened in the investigation and handling, the three principal leaders have also been punished by dismissal, warnings within the party, admonishing conversations, etc., but these punishments are only given from the perspective of party discipline and discipline. From the above analysis, it can be seen that "eating" nutritious meals for students has been suspected of corruption and should be punished according to law. In fact, there was a precedent before the trial of misappropriating student meals. For example, the headmaster of Yao Hong Middle School in Xiji County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region was sentenced to 1 1 year on 20/2.
It is worth mentioning that this incident has once again exposed the supervision of the use of student nutrition meal subsidies. As the superior department in charge of the school, how to supervise and manage the implementation of students' nutritious meals and the use of financial subsidies more effectively really needs further thinking in order to really make students' nutritious meals play a role.