And there is no conflict between insisting on theoretical education and attaching importance to practical education. The education in our country has been reforming all the time. At present, theoretical education is more important, because the current class has not solidified particularly seriously, and of course it is almost the same.
Why does the United States attach importance to practical education? Because this is the performance after curing. After the class is solidified, those rich people will gradually change the rules and make them more suitable for them to play. It is basically difficult for people at the bottom to cross classes.
It is said that practice is important, but who says that people with strong theory have poor practice? Who gave us this knowledge? Is it true?/You don't say. /You don't say. I don't know, I can't say, but I know that people at the bottom can cross classes by learning theoretical knowledge, but if they pay more attention to practice, that is, quality education, then people at the bottom are doomed.
People at the bottom can't beat the second generation. College entrance examination is the fairest way of education at present, which is much fairer than the distribution of educational resources in other developed countries in Europe and America, and even dumped it for a few places. However, I don't think many people blow this thing. They are all blowing quality education in Europe and America.
Rich people have enough money to control the media and the thoughts of most people, which will make us feel that this is the case. In fact, it has always been like this, right?
So they began to discuss which is more important, theory or practice, but is this the key to the problem? No, that's not the point. That's not what we're talking about Everyone knows that practice is as important as theory.
So what kind of power is behind our discussion of this issue?