Disadvantages: 1 It is not conducive to students' mastery of English knowledge and hinders the cultivation of talents by the state. 2. It is not conducive to the development of education in poor areas and widens the gap between the rich and the poor. 3. It has a negative impact on employment and teaching. Specific analysis of extended data:
The reform of NMET English has the following advantages:
1. Promote the return of the essence of English education: examination policy is the "baton" of English education and has a guiding role in English education. Under the traditional exam-oriented education model, the communicative nature of English is greatly reduced, which has largely become a "stepping stone" for further study and employment. Exam-oriented English teaching deviates from the original intention of English education. Therefore, if English is not included in the total score of NMET or unified NMET, it will help English to stay away from exams, return to the function of communication tools and get out of the "dead end" of exam-oriented education.
2. Promote the research on English teaching and testing: Socialization of English college entrance examination requires relevant education departments and institutions to make corresponding adjustments in the curriculum, teachers' equipment, teaching content and teaching methods at the teaching level, actively carry out teaching research and explore new teaching modes.
3, reflecting the student-oriented: more than a year of examination, breaking the "one exam for life", providing more choices for candidates, reflecting the humanistic care for candidates. To a certain extent, taking the exam for more than one year will help candidates to relieve the pressure of the exam and reduce their fear of the college entrance examination. Finally, English training institutions are one of the beneficiaries of the socialization of English college entrance examination. As the number of exams increases, the number of students in training institutions will also increase. The increase of students requires training institutions to expand the scale of teachers and develop new training programs. These changes not only created profits, but also promoted employment.
NMET's English reform has the following shortcomings:
1, which is not conducive to students' mastery of English knowledge and hinders the cultivation of talents by the state: college entrance examination for more than one year is not conducive to students' mastery of language, and language learning needs long-term persistence and repeated study and use. If a student passes with excellent grades in Grade One, and suspends English study in Grade Two and Grade Three, the lack of study in these two years may bring his English level back to the starting point.
2. It is not conducive to the development of education in poverty-stricken areas and widens the gap between the rich and the poor: the development of college entrance examination English in the direction of socialized examination will have a greater impact on backward areas of education and increase the "English gap." For areas with rich educational resources, such as Beishangguang, if the English in the classroom can't meet the high requirements of students, we can find extra-curricular ways, and there are also many choices about whether to take the college entrance examination or study abroad in the future. However, for children in areas with relatively poor educational resources, such reform will make the opportunities for children who should enjoy basic English education free of charge smaller and smaller, and the gap with students in developed areas will become larger and larger.
3. Adverse effects on employment and teaching: The reform has a great impact on English, and some colleges and universities have reduced the employment of English teachers, which is self-evident, and the unemployment phenomenon will be more severe after graduation. In the process of teaching, teachers must gradually adapt to this change, which brings certain difficulties to teaching.