Eloquence and oral communicative competence are two different concepts. In the debate, you can refute it from this point and emphasize the difference between eloquence and oral communication ability. This paper will discuss how to improve eloquence from the aspects of influence, interpretation of literary talent and eloquence, and application of literary talent.

Take influence as the standard.

It may be a good choice to take the impact as the standard. We discuss this issue from two aspects: social influence and personal influence. At the social level, the signing of formal documents is obviously more legally effective than oral agreements, which has far-reaching significance for cultural inheritance and education. From a personal point of view, self-cultivation literature is helpful to improve self-cultivation and comprehensive quality, so as to better adapt to social needs.

Interpretation of literary talent and eloquence

The interpretation of literary talent and eloquence cannot be limited to the general interpretation of modern Chinese. We should understand them from a broader perspective. For example, literary talent can be understood as the ability to write poems, while talent involves the category of knowledge and application ability. Therefore, literary talent can be regarded as having the knowledge of writing poetry and the ability to apply this knowledge.

Pay attention to the use of literary talent

Attention should be paid to the use of literary talent in argumentation. Because this proposition itself is slightly unfavorable to you, therefore, we should make more efforts in language expression and strive to pull back a game in form and language.

Avoid logical misunderstanding

We must resolutely avoid falling into the logical misunderstanding of "how can we have eloquence without literary talent?" This is a comparative question, and we just need to refute it quickly when the other party puts forward this point.