1. Many years ago, schools in each village merged into one town and one school or two towns and one school! Not to mention high school, from the original county more than a dozen high schools merged into several!

2. Students have changed from going to school at home to going to school by school bus or parents' shuttle or cycling, which will inevitably bring many difficulties to parents and children!

3. Students who study well, students who have some money at home, students whose parents go to the city to buy a house, and students who have relations with the city all go to the city to go to school, resulting in a serious loss of students!

Excellent teachers don't want to teach in the countryside, but try their best to enter the city. Later, almost all the supplementary forces were inexperienced new teachers, and the rest of the students could not get out. No matter how hard the teacher tries to teach, it can't be effective. This forms a vicious circle. The worse the teaching performance in rural areas, the less children like to study in rural schools!

Although the government also attaches great importance to rural education, renovating school buildings, equipping teachers, purchasing teaching facilities, and striving to improve school conditions, it is the general trend in any case. Rural education is not optimistic!

Story 1:

18 years old, started as a civil affairs teacher and worked as a teacher in the countryside for 32 years. At present, the school has more than 600 students, 13 classes and 18 teachers. Most rural schools have few students, and rural primary schools with a large population like ours are estimated to be few. These parents send their students to our school because our teaching quality and management are very strict. This also shows how hard and tired our teacher usually works.

Five teachers in the school passed the exam this summer. The whole school teacher 16, only 1 1 left. The central school has added seven teachers, but it is still under great pressure. The school can't hire two more teachers. In order to enable the school to start classes normally, the central school requires all newly recruited teachers to work for five years before they are allowed to take the exam, otherwise they will not be signed. This practice is no less inhuman and illegal than drinking poison to quench thirst, but if it is not done, the school will always be short of teachers and will never make ends meet. These young people don't want to stay in the countryside, their living conditions are poor, their wages are low, and it is inconvenient to go home by car. Sympathize with these young people and those starving children, and say something inappropriate: loyalty and filial piety can't be both.

According to a teacher who was admitted to the market, he now has about ten classes a week, and almost everyone in the school has these classes, but in this way, the school invited several teachers and the Education Bureau paid them. Our school has 20 classes per capita, excluding morning meetings and afternoon reading, and the time to watch classes at noon 12:30- 1:30 is after lunch (after the reform of nutritious meals, teachers have to attend classes to see students). The school applied for some salary and handed in the report. The leader said that he had no money and had to solve it himself, which meant taking the risk of being invited to tea.

Seeing some nonsense questions and insulting remarks about teachers, I don't understand their motives. There are rats in any industry, but it can be said for sure that most teachers in rural areas are excellent, and it is no exaggeration to describe them as selfless dedication and obscurity.

We should be kind to education, which is the future of a country and a nation. We should not be outspoken and lose the bottom line because of temporary interests and accidental phenomena.

Story 2:

One of my uncles is 57 years old and is a rural primary school teacher. A distant relative is 35 years old and teaches in a township middle school. They are representatives of two types of rural teachers, which gives me the impression that my cousin's teaching workload in rural primary schools is relatively small and relaxed; Relatives are busy teaching in township middle schools and are under great pressure.

My uncle is a high school graduate. He didn't go to college and came back to be a private school teacher. Later, he became a public teacher according to the policy. He has taught Chinese in my hometown for nearly 40 years. He has been a primary school principal for many years and is very familiar with the education in his hometown.

Last time I went back to my hometown for dinner, my uncle drank two more cups and talked about being a teacher. My cousin was very emotional and said to me: It is ok to be a teacher in a rural primary school now. There are few children at school, so it's easy. I won't go to the city to teach. ?

It turns out that in recent years, the number of primary school students in my hometown has dropped sharply, and the third to sixth grades have to go to the central primary school and live on campus. There are less than 30 children in the first and second grades in the village, but there are six or seven teachers. The curriculum of the first and second grades of primary school is simple and there is no pressure to go to school. He is familiar with his job and finds it easy.

The hard work of rural teachers also comes from the work distribution of various departments. For example, this year's poverty alleviation work is not under the control of school teachers, but is also assigned to school teachers, and some forms of epidemic prevention stations also require teachers to complete it.

Based on the above actual situation, let's judge how hard the rural teachers are. I am afraid this kind of suffering is unbearable, so there will be a phenomenon that few people care about the profession of rural teachers.