One of the suggestions is "Please remember: there are no abstract students". Abstraction is relatively concrete, and every student is a real and independent individual. The example given by Suhomlinski is very accurate. I didn't understand the intention of this suggestion until I read this example. He said, "For example, if a child carries water, one child will be exhausted if he carries five buckets, while another child can carry 20 buckets." I remember a philosopher said that there are no two identical leaves in the world. Among our children, each child's personality is different, each child's temper is different, each child's intelligence is definitely different, and each child's memory ability is definitely different. Faced with such a group of different individuals, our current classroom teaching system requires students to have a model and a standard, and education has become a kind of processing. At this time, I suddenly remembered an old educator, Mr. Ye Shengtao, who said, "Education is agriculture, not industry." Facing such diverse individuals, how can education be like processing parts in a factory? With the development of society, education should return to the era of Greek Socrates and China Confucius, and face every educational object.
Pay attention to the individual differences of students, pay attention to the growth of students' personality and teach students in accordance with their aptitude.
But we must also face the reality, how to carry out personalized education in a teaching class with more than 50 or 60 students? In this environment, Suhomlinski pointed out a certain direction for us: let every teacher help students establish the concept of "academic achievement", don't expect every student to get a hundred points, protect every student's self-esteem, and don't ask students to do impossible things. Suhomlinski said, "The skill and art of education and teaching lies in giving full play to every child's strength and possibility, so that he can enjoy the joy of mental work." There should be different standards for students' requirements. Some students can assign 2-4 questions, while others only assign one question. I was thinking, it's not just that. We want a student-by-student study. Some students like praise, while others should sound the alarm. Some students need stimulation. Let him do what he likes and learn to wait. If he doesn't understand this year, he may suddenly wake up in the second half of the semester. Our teachers should also try the group teaching method put forward by Suhomlinski.
In short, in the face of these independent individuals, we can never use a ruler to ask all students to open a lock with a key, and each student has a set of teaching methods. There are no abstract students, so we can only come up with specific educational methods. This is my deepest feeling when I read the suggestion "Please remember: no abstract students".