First, dress casually and behave inappropriately.
In social psychology, there is a very important rule in the formation of "impression" of others: the first cause effect, that is, the "first impression effect", means that people pay more attention to the information they first get and judge others accordingly. The same is true during the interview. After knocking on the door and entering the examination room, the examiner will pay attention to the overall image of the candidates at first sight, and even pay attention to this point during the whole answering process. Therefore, if the candidate does not pay attention to his manners, his first impression will be negative, even if he answers well, he will be discounted and his score will not be high. Moreover, this exam itself is also a very important exam, and he must not slack off on his external image at will.
Second, there was no eye contact with the examiner when answering the questions.
The interview itself is a process of face-to-face communication with the examiner. In addition to passing the answer information to the examiner, we should also have the feeling of communication, so as to leave a good impression on the examiner. However, many candidates don't look at the examiner because they are nervous and unfamiliar, and even some candidates don't even know that there is a male examiner and several female examiners in the examiner. If you can't face to face, it will be difficult to communicate well, which will make examiners feel that their psychological quality is too poor and it will be difficult for them to hold important jobs in their posts in the future. At the same time, the former examiner is also a kind of respect for the examiner, so candidates should ensure that they face the former examiner at least half the time at the interview site, so as to get high marks in form.
Third, the answer reveals personal information.
The principle of openness, fairness and justice is required in the interview of civil servants, and its purpose is to prevent all kinds of black-box operations. In recent years, many related units have become very strict about the specific requirements of interviews, and not revealing personal information during interviews is one of the key requirements (depending on the situation). During the interview, candidates can only give their answer number, and can't introduce their name, hometown, graduation institution and other detailed information. If they say it carelessly at the interview site, it will become a deduction. After all, knowing the name and other information will break the information asymmetry pattern of examiners to candidates, and once it is broken, it will be prone to black-box operation.
Fourth, the answer is not confident and the amount is too small.
Many candidates answer questions in a low voice due to factors such as lack of self-confidence and nervousness, which makes it difficult for listeners to hear clearly what candidates are saying. When we speak, we usually adjust the volume according to the distance, so that the other party can hear clearly, and so does the interview. Loud voices can better show themselves, and also allow examiners to concentrate on extracting their answers. Especially when the examiner is in a state of fatigue, candidates must attract the examiner's attention with a loud voice, so that your answer can be accepted by the examiner and you can get high marks. It is an external form that candidates who need to make a comeback must do.
Fifth, the content of the answer has no hierarchy.
If the answer is not hierarchical, the examiner will feel puzzled. The interview time is not very long. At this time, if the answer is smelly and long, it will definitely be rejected by the examiner. The layering of the answer content can't be practiced in a short time, but it takes candidates long-term training to form. However, candidates can try to be hierarchical and logical through some layered languages. For example, candidates don't need to use "at the same time", "then" and "then" when explaining several elements, because it is difficult to show the appropriate hierarchical relationship to the examiner with these words. If the examinee changes to digital words such as "first", "second" and "third", it can better reflect hierarchy and logic. Therefore, candidates should learn to explain the content in an orderly way during training, and don't want all the answers to be like a pot of porridge, which seems to have no hierarchy.
Sixth, when answering questions, you can't grasp the key points.
The focus is on the details of the answer. Many candidates said a lot when answering questions, with fluent language and good sense of hierarchy, but they just couldn't grasp the core point of the question, so it was difficult to get high marks for such answers. In the future, candidates must read every sentence carefully, and the core of the general answer can be found from the stem. As long as you can find the core of the topic and present it in the content, your score will definitely be by going up one flight of stairs. For example, such a question "the unit leader asked you to organize an induction training for new employees." How will you proceed? " . For this question, most candidates will only grasp the key point of "training" and then elaborate, but we should know that there is a more important core of this question, that is, "entry", so candidates should explain the training content in detail, such as corporate culture, workflow, rules and regulations and so on. Only by grasping the key points of each question can we win the final interview.