(Total score 100)

Quotation part: 50 points

Business part: 24 points

Technical part: 26 points

Calculation method of bid evaluation benchmark price

If the bidder's bid price is higher than the tender control price, it will be rejected;

Bid evaluation benchmark price = arithmetic average of all valid bidders' bid quotations *50%+ bidding control price *50%.

Calculation formula of deviation rate of bid quotation

Deviation rate = 100%× (bidder's quotation-bid evaluation benchmark price)/bid evaluation benchmark price

tender offer

50 points

When the tender offer is equal to the bid evaluation benchmark price, it is basically divided into 45 points;

When the bid price is higher than the bid evaluation benchmark price, deduct 1 point from 45 points for each height 1% until the deduction is finished;

When the tender offer is lower than the bid evaluation benchmark price, each lower price increase 1% will be scored, and the maximum score will be 5 points.

When the tender offer is less than 5% (excluding 5%) of the bid evaluation benchmark price, deduct 1% for each low price, until the end of deduction;

Note: The score is calculated by interpolation, and two decimal places are reserved.

Business part

Enterprise strength, reputation and performance

14 point

1. If the bidder's credit is rated as AAA by the social credit rating agency, score 3 points, score 2 points if it is AAA, and score 0 if it is dissatisfied;

2. Product application cases: If the main products of the bid have application cases in the provincial political and legal system, 3 points will be scored, and no score will be scored.

3. Company performance: (0-8 points)

Since the month of 2065.438+00,654.38+010 (subject to the signing date of the contract), the bidder will get 2 points for each similar project performance contract with an amount of not less than 6.5438+0 million yuan, with a maximum of 8 points.

A copy of the bidding documents (with official seal) must be provided for all kinds of certification materials required above, and all originals shall be verified during bid evaluation.

Commitment and after-sales service guarantee

10 point

1. Other substantive preferential terms and commitments put forward by the bidder outside the bidding scope, including service methods within the warranty period, service methods outside the warranty period and maintenance service fees, etc. , should be scored within the scope of 1-4 according to the bidder's commitment;

2. The bidder has a detailed and comprehensive training plan, and scores 1-3 as appropriate;

3. The bidder has a perfect after-sales service mechanism, can provide 7*24-hour response service, and arrives at the site within 4 hours after receiving the fault notice, and the score is within the range of 1-3.

Technical part

Construction management plan

18 point

1. According to the actual situation of the project and the rationality and practicability of the provided construction scheme, score between 2 and 6 points;

2. According to the project management organization structure and personnel composition of the bidder, the score is within the range of 1-4;

3. According to the feasibility and rationality of the guarantee measures to ensure the construction quality and safety, and the rationality of the construction schedule, the score is within 2-5 points;

4. According to the rationality and practicability of the bidder's maintenance plan, score in the range of 1-3.

If the above items are missing or omitted, score 0.

Product quality and technical data

8 points

1. product quality: the input products are of high quality among similar products, and the quality assurance measures are feasible, reasonable and reliable; The sources of main raw materials and purchased parts are clear, and the judges will score in the range of 1-4 as appropriate;

2. If the main products have complete inspection certificates, product manuals and other Chinese materials issued by relevant institutions, the judges will score in the range of 1-4 as appropriate.

This paper introduces four common methods of engineering bid evaluation.

Reasonable low price method:

The bid evaluation committee recommends the top three bidders as the winning bidders according to the order of the bid price scores from high to low (when the bid price scores are equal, the bidder with lower bid price is preferred), and the tenderer can set the upper limit of the bid control price (cancel the lower limit and cancel the technical score).

Scope of application: Except for super-large bridges and long tunnels with particularly complicated technology, the bid evaluation should adopt the reasonable low price method.

Note: When selling the tender documents, the tenderer shall provide the "Software Disk for Application of Bill of Quantities Data" at the same time, and the format, quantities and operation definitions in the "Software Disk for Application of Bill of Quantities Data" shall ensure that the bidder cannot modify it.

Minimum evaluation method

Brief introduction of the method: The top three bidders who have passed the preliminary evaluation and detailed evaluation and the lowest bid evaluation price are recommended as the winning bidders by the bid evaluation committee. If it is lower than 15% of the normal quotation, it needs to be proved, otherwise it will be invalid. If you win the bid, you need to increase the cash guarantee.

Scope of application: The lowest bid evaluation method is used to evaluate projects loaned by international financial organizations such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank, and small-scale and low-tech projects.

Matters needing attention: It is suggested that the tenderee set the pre-tender price, strictly control the bid-winning behavior at low price, and the pre-tender price should be announced at the time of bid opening; When signing a contract, it is necessary to clarify the requirements for the entry of construction personnel and equipment, the requirements for the progress of the project, and the liability for breach of contract and treatment measures.

Comprehensive evaluation method

Method Description: The Bid Evaluation Committee comprehensively scores the bid evaluation price, financial ability, technical ability, management level, performance and reputation of all the bid documents that have passed the preliminary evaluation and detailed evaluation, and ranks them from high to low, and recommends the three bidders with the highest comprehensive scores as the winning candidates. There is a pre-tender estimate method (the pre-tender estimate should be published at the time of bid opening, and it is only used as a reference in the bid evaluation process, and cannot be used as a direct basis for deciding to reject the bid) and a non-pre-tender estimate method (the same as paragraph 03).

Scope of application: This method is only applicable to super-large bridges and long tunnels with particularly complicated technology.

Note: It is suggested that the tenderee set the pre-tender price or set the upper limit of the tender control price.

Double envelope bid evaluation method

Brief introduction of the method: The quotation and list are sealed separately from the commercial and technical tenders, and the bids are opened twice. Open the technical and commercial tender first, review the top three, and then open the quotation tender (the same as paragraph 03).

Scope of application: It is suitable for large-scale, technically complex or particularly complex projects, but reasonable low price method, lowest bid evaluation method or comprehensive evaluation method should be adopted according to the guiding opinions and different characteristics of the projects.