I agree that some people want to enter public schools, which are secure, relatively stable and without too much pressure. However, this situation will change with the change of policy and the development of society. For example, at least from the policy level, private kindergarten teachers have begun to enjoy the same rating opportunities. With the deepening of reform, "public institutions" will gradually end in China. Then when this day comes, you can still rely on your personal ability.

The change of the times, after 80, 90, entered the workplace. The concept of this generation will have its own distinct characteristics, especially the requirements for the realization and identification of personal values will be different from those of previous generations. Within the system, the situation of seniority is still prevalent. Young people's personal progress will be hindered. Some people don't want to spend a long life in this atmosphere. In other words, if you work in a public school, you will never be a teacher? The position of manager is always in the minority, so it must be you?

The so-called good master varies from person to person. If you think a big organization is a good owner, it may not be. Here, perhaps because of the gathering of talents, perhaps because of some systems and processes, you lack opportunities for performance and room for improvement. Think carefully, why did Zhuge Liang go to Liu Bei instead of Cao Cao? It is not a reason to be able to appear quickly and realize your personal ambitions. "In Liu Bei's place, he eats crabs first. In Cao Cao's place, he is one of them."

When the sun rises, it will eventually set. There is no fixed domestic or foreign. The same is true for big brands, and small brands will also succeed one day. This is not about money. You can gain more from the growth of small brands. All you get from joining a big brand is a full meal.

Don't be superstitious about big brands. All you can believe is how valuable you are. The turnover rate of New Oriental is not low. All brands are similar. Man struggles upwards and water flows downwards, which is a natural phenomenon.

Second, the perspective of institutions.

What is the turnover rate? Maybe you think it's high, but it's not that high. Frankly speaking, teachers can be stable for a year or two.

Is stability a good thing? Not necessarily. Public schools are stable, but the teaching quality is not necessarily high. The result of market competition is that the team must be optimized. Teachers are also team members and should meet this requirement.

Is the standard of good teachers in institutions correct? The organization believes that the higher the level, the better the teacher. This is a misunderstanding. Here are two concepts for your reference. First, teachers whose local level is slightly higher than that of other institutions are good teachers. Second, enough to teach students. Teachers who are helpful to students and loved by students or parents are good teachers.

Institutions, especially those founded by individuals, have a higher level. You can't just consider your own income. Everyone else works for you. Who wants to be "exploited" forever? You can take equity and so on. Let everyone share the fruits of development. In this way, more people will follow you in the long run.

Institutional managers should cultivate self-cultivation and improve personal management literacy. Learn and improve in team management, performance incentive and so on, and become a beloved leader. The shaping of personal charm also plays a great role in the stability of the team.