The first step is to examine the questions first, especially to grasp the three elements of identity, occasion and theme, which is the breakthrough. Knowing the identity and the occasion where the speech is applicable, candidates need to think about what they want to achieve or what role they want to play in this occasion. For example, the 20 14 national examination applies for topics above the provincial level. As the staff of the Provincial Education Department, when they come to colleges and universities to participate in an activity, they should observe and inspect on behalf of the superior units. Now that this activity is over, you need to make a concluding speech. This time is nothing more than an evaluation of this activity. How to evaluate it needs to explain to the audience what kind of activity it is and what kind of significance it has.

The second step is to grasp the main points through reading materials. Back to the corresponding given data 3, the material only introduces the specific content of this mental health festival in S University and what kind of gains it has brought to students. So in this speech, we must introduce the contents and significance of different activities, but is it enough to write only these contents in this question?

The third step is to combine the examination questions and material points to determine the final answer. When examining the questions, you can know that candidates need to speak on behalf of the higher authorities when answering questions. Then, apart from summarizing and commenting on the activities, what contents of this speech should meet your identity? In other words, at the end of the speech, we need to put forward the expectations of the teachers and students of the whole school, so as to make the speech highly. Therefore, combining the key points such as identity, occasion and material itself, we can determine the way to answer this question, that is, introduce the content and significance of the activity respectively, and finally mention the expectations of students.

The last step is to standardize the writing. At the same time, in answering this question, we should pay attention to the requirements of vividness and appeal of language, that is, we should not just extract sentences from the original text, but summarize and refine the materials and express them fluently and vividly in different ways.

According to this idea, we analyze two questions of the 20 13 national examination in turn, and we will find that the essence of these questions is actually a summary of the content of the materials, that is, on the occasion of a speech, the main points mentioned in the materials are basically what we want to mention in the speech, which is equivalent to summarizing the content of the given materials. Next, candidates can follow the idea of "good phenomenon+problem+cause+influence+countermeasures", such as the explanation of Mazu culture, which is more about the status quo and the countermeasures are basically without focus. Even if there are countermeasures, they are put forward in an imperative tone. However, the speeches in the lectures of the training class are definitely countermeasures, but there are no main points of countermeasures in the materials, so it is necessary to indirectly push countermeasures or create their own countermeasures.