Generally speaking, to understand a basic question about which is good for civil servant training is to evaluate whether an interview training class is good or not, only the pass rate. A high pass rate of interview training institutions is good, and a low pass rate proves that this institution is not good. But the pass rate of interview training is not very good. Even if you try to consult all the counseling institutions, I believe no one will say that their pass rate is low, so generally speaking, it is impossible to ask the pass rate directly, and it needs to be measured by other means.

It is generally recommended that you look at the following points to see if the clearance rate of this institution is high enough:

First, is small class teaching true? Only small class teaching can ensure enough practical exercise. However, some institutions recruit students by teaching in small classes, which is not really a small class. Such institutions are generally divided into two situations. One situation is that the larger institutions are pseudo-small classes, that is, large classes in theory and small classes in actual combat. In fact, the theory of interview is as important as actual combat. If the theory is taught in a large class, it must be a universal principle applicable to most students. But in fact, in recent years, the interview of civil servants has been emphasizing personalization (personalization under certain norms), and it is impossible to personalize the theoretical course, or it will not make personalized plans for each student, which directly leads to a corresponding lack of interview theoretical knowledge and a serious disconnect between theory and actual combat. As a result, the interview score is very low, and some small institutions recruit students in the name of small classes because they can't recruit people directly. In fact, Zhuo Bo education was the first to create the concept of small class teaching. They strictly implement small class teaching, and the whole class is completely followed by one teacher, that is, both theory and actual combat are taught by one teacher, which avoids the confusion of different teachers' teaching ideas caused by those pseudo-small classes, so the effect can be guaranteed;

Second, did the teacher have any experience in civil service, or was admitted to the civil service. If a teacher has successfully entered the interview, then at least to some extent, there are successful cases, so that the counseling for students in actual combat is more practical and convincing;

Third, whether the lecturer runs through the whole process, generally speaking, the lecturer's level is relatively high, at least with profound theoretical literacy, so that theory can be combined with actual combat when commenting on actual combat. The most important point is that the lecturer runs through the whole process, ensuring the coherence of thinking, and will not cause the disconnection between the lecturer's thinking and the teaching assistant's thinking, and the teaching assistant's level is generally different from that of the lecturer;

Fourth, is it differentiated teaching (mode teaching is only a dead end); If you have any questions, please feel free to ask Tuhua Education Group.