1, I hope you have time to read my article "What is light? Why can't humans observe that matter runs faster than light? "When an object reaches the speed of light and superluminal, will time stagnate or lead to time to go back?" , be sure to Baidu "Jingling Lake Jasper Orchid Idolization? .
2. Causes of gravity (briefly): When high-energy particles running in space pass through matter (celestial bodies or particles), some of them are intercepted and absorbed, thus forming a weak energy region (Einstein's space-time bending), which is the gravitational action range mV2=E=Mv2 (formula of conservation law of energy conversion). For a detailed explanation, please refer to the forthcoming article "Element Period and the Cause of Gravity".
Einstein: Please, I know you like taking pictures of me.
So I clicked on this netizen's dynamic speech, and found that he has been tirelessly leaving messages for various articles, and his remarks are based on? Deny mainstream scientific knowledge? Mainly. For example, he also left a message under another article:
I followed the advice of netizens and searched the titles of articles he showed me, such as "What is light?"? Why can't humans observe that matter runs faster than light? " Sure enough, I found a netizen with the ID of Jasper Orchid in the idolization of Jingling Lake, and published a book called "What is light? Why can't humans observe that matter runs faster than light? An article in ".
I haven't had time to read the article carefully, but a message from a man calling himself Wang Minsheng in the message area at the bottom of the article caught my attention. This friend named Wang Minsheng wrote something like this, see below.
Very? Wonderful? But without logic, he first gave a very? Wonderful? The formula is: z = syw = MC 2 = STK 3.
In this formula, he did not explain the meanings of mathematical symbols such as Z, S, Y, W, etc. I think MC^2. I don't know if there is a c that refers to the speed of light, because it is a bit similar to Einstein's mass-energy equation. The mass-energy equation describes the equivalent relationship between mass and energy.
The following is Einstein's equation of mass and energy:
Einstein's Equation of Mass and Energy
Where e stands for energy, m stands for mass and c stands for the speed of light (c is a constant, c=299792458 m/s).
If Wang Minsheng's MC^2 refers to a part of the mass-energy equation, does his Z refer to energy? But why not use the universal mathematical symbol e instead?
Mr. Wang Minsheng went on to say:
The universe as a whole consists of thinking subject, known number and unknown number. The thinking subject is a part of the universe as a whole, the known number is also a part of the universe as a whole, and the unknown number is still a part of the universe as a whole, so multiply by three factors.
He gave three key words: thinking subject, known number and unknown number, and thought that the multiplication of these three things was the whole universe. Based on this, I roughly speculate that the three mathematical symbols of S, Y and W in his previous formula should correspond to the following thinking subjects, known numbers and unknown numbers. Namely: s thinking subject, y known number, w unknown number. According to the Chinese phonetic alphabet, I think the above corresponds like this. For example, s is the subject of thinking? Think? The phonetic symbols of this word.
Seeing this, I want to ask this friend:
1, what did you say? The whole universe? , what does this mean? Is it a physical concept, such as the total amount of matter and energy in the universe, or a philosophical or even metaphysical concept? According to the following, I personally feel that this should be a metaphysical concept, not even a philosophical concept.
2. The MC^2 term you gave should be the quadratic multiplication of mass and the speed of light, and the result should be energy. And you, MC^2 and the whole universe can be equated. I don't know the inevitable logical relationship between the universe as a whole and energy. This is because the overall concept of the universe you gave is not clear. If the universe as a whole is energy, why is it the universe as a whole? If you think that the universe as a whole is not energy, but just a concept, that is, the product of thinking subject, known number and unknown number, then I want to change a question. Namely:
3. Why is it the multiplication of the known number and the unknown number, not the addition, or the multiplication of the three and the addition of the square? How do you come to the conclusion that the multiplication of these three is equal to the whole universe?
How did you deduce that the multiplication of these three elements can suddenly be equal to Einstein's intelligent formula?
5. I can also ask, you say that the universe as a whole is related to three elements: thinking subject, known number and unknown number, but how do you prove that it is related to these three elements? Can you give experimental data or mathematical deduction to prove it?
6. What are the specific concepts of these three elements that you often mention? Is it a physical concept? If it is a physical concept, please describe it in precise mathematical language. If it is not a physical concept, what do these three elements mean? How to deduce that these three elements must be related to the universe as a whole? Where is the process of derivation?
This Mr. Wang Minsheng created another STK^3 in his career. After reading the terms of this formula, I guess S is the subject of thinking. What do T and K mean? If the guess is correct, t generally refers to time. Let's assume that Mr. Wang Minsheng's T is time, so what is K? Mr. Wang didn't say. A little mysterious, hehe.
Teacher Wang believes that the result of multiplying the thinking subject by the cube of time and k is not only equal to the whole universe, but also equal to the energy of Einstein's intelligent equation. I ask Mr. Wang to answer:
What is the specific basis of these equivalent calculations you gave? Can you show me the experimental evidence? Why does your formula look messy and illogical?
The complexity of the universe can be described in a simple sentence? Mr Wang Minsheng went on to write:
The universe as a whole is colorful, complex, controversial and simple and beautiful: the whole mathematical formula is also the law of the whole cosmology!
This passage reminds me of what a friend said in an article "Intellectuals". He said that philosophers always think that the unparalleled complexity of the universe can be summarized by simple ideas and described by sentences containing several simple words.
Some people always underestimate the complexity of things.
In ancient Greece more than 2,000 years ago, philosophers in the Aegean Sea and the ancient Greek Peninsula believed that everything in the universe was composed of four basic substances: earth, fire, gas and water. This is because these four things are very easy to see in life, and some people can intuitively think that they are very basic things. However, scientists have long proved that there is no so-called fire element in the world. The essential principle of fire is that particles are moving violently, not basic matter. Air is not a single element, but a variety of components, such as oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, and many inert gases, mineral dust, microorganisms, etc., so there is no so-called air element. The soil is more complicated, including all kinds of different minerals. The soil composition varies greatly around the world, which is very complicated. So? Earth? Does not conform to the concept of basic matter.
Ancient Greek four-element theory
Philosophers in the world, according to their own intuition, think that these four things constitute the whole of all things in the world without any argument. In the final analysis, these ideas are enlightenment at best. Enlightenment actually contains rough and primitive meanings. Although it is further than pure barbarism, it is backward and simple after all. We cannot directly apply these ideas to modern scientific concepts. Otherwise, the crude metaphysical concepts such as Yin-Yang and Five Elements become a part of the scientific system. In fact, Mr Wang Minsheng made the mistake of taking simple and direct mistakes as truth. Without any experimental process, you dare to draw conclusions just by brainwave, and your attitude is inevitably too hasty.
Many people's friends like to leave messages everywhere on the internet and try their best to promote their newly founded theories, but none of them have any impact. Online blog articles are not recognized by academic circles. If you want to publish your own theory, you should follow academic norms and submit as required. Otherwise, no matter how many blogs you write, you are just entertaining yourself.
As for netizens? Is the Jasper Orchid being worshipped by Jing Ling Lake? Published "What is light? Why can't humans observe that matter runs faster than light? How is this article written? Is there any scientific basis? I will analyze it next time.
Author: Questioner