Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Heavy losses! How do you think Xiaogang Feng will pay Huayi Brothers 235 million yuan if he fails to gamble again?
Heavy losses! How do you think Xiaogang Feng will pay Huayi Brothers 235 million yuan if he fails to gamble again?
According to relevant news media reports, Xiaogang Feng, a famous entertainment director, failed to reach a gambling agreement. Not only did he not profit from the contract he signed, but he also had to pay for it himself. It's interesting to me, too. This is not the first time that Xiaogang Feng has failed in a gambling agreement. Once this information was exposed, it immediately attracted the attention of netizens from all walks of life. Netizens have left messages on the message board, and the debate under the related forums is also fierce, but everyone's mentality is very consistent. Xiaogang Feng is really not good at this unequal gambling agreement, but is this really the objective fact?

Who doesn't know Xiaogang Feng in China entertainment circle? He is not only one of the best film directors in China entertainment circle, but also a well-known actor with superb acting skills. At the beginning, a movie "world without thieves" was popular all over the country, which made all fans see his powerful basic skills as a film director, and also let us know that China also has a good film director who can shoot Hollywood film characteristics; Later, I personally starred in "Friends", which also gave us great surprises. I didn't expect Xiaogang Feng to not only direct, but also perform.

But even a well-known director like Xiaogang Feng, who is basically hard to find an opponent in the film director circle, is now troubled by the total flow of entertainment circles. Some people say that Xiaogang Feng won the Golden Horse Award, but failed at the box office. In fact, this is Xiaogang Feng in 20 16. In 20 16, Xiaogang Feng won the best film award of this year's Golden Horse Award without objection for his film "I am not Pan Jinlian". The film works that can win the "Best Film Award" only have a "funny" box office of $70 million, which is somewhat shabby compared with the films with a box office of 2 billion at present.

It is likely that some people will say that it is unreasonable to compare the cumulative box office five years ago with today's movies. Although there is a difference between the price level and the total flow, apart from this factor, I am not Pan Jinlian, who is a little worse or a little more than Detective Chinatown 3's "Hi Mom", a movie with a new box office record.

In fact, Xiaogang Feng has done his best in these aspects of movie box office. Apart from appearance, he is the best billboard. Before filming "I am not Pan Jinlian", he had sold his business. The enterprise in Xiaogang Feng is called Dongyang Mira. It was a small company that he applied for registration on 20 15. All assets are only 13600 yuan, and there are debts 19 1000 yuan. Sounds like some shell companies. But only two months later, Dongyang Meila Media Company was recycled by Huayi Brothers. At the beginning, Huayi Brothers had nowhere to spend money, and waved10.05 billion in cash to recycle Dongyang Mira.

Huayi Brothers is not an idiot. It's not easy to be stupid enough to spend money on shell companies. What they bought was not Dongyang Milla, but the famous director Xiaogang Feng. This kind of thing often happens in the entertainment circle. Large enterprises invest capital to buy enterprises with big-name star positions, but artists' companies must earn enough money during the contract period to generate profits for large enterprises.

To put it bluntly, the gambling agreement is actually a star signing contract. Large enterprises are optimistic about the development potential of stars, and the stars set their own prices TX. The agreement of Huayi Brothers is that Dongyang Milla must generate a net profit of 674 million RMB for them in the next five years, otherwise Xiaogang Feng will take out 674 million RMB from105 million RMB to fill the profit gap.

Before it was recycled by Huayi Brothers, Xiaogang Feng's films had been off the air for many years. Only one product is produced every year after recycling, which forces the increase of its own output. There is no way. In the case of shortage of manpower, we must work hard to earn movie box office to achieve our goal, otherwise we will have to pay for it ourselves. It's a pity that the result of this gambling agreement did not produce mutual benefit and win-win results. On April 28th, Huayi Brothers released its 2020 corporate annual report. According to the data, the net profit of Dongyang Meila in Xiaogang Feng in that year was only 5,523,800 yuan, which was far from the overall target of 6,543,800 yuan+74,900 yuan in the original contract.

In addition, after the 2065438+2008 Xiaogang Feng gambling agreement failed, more than 67 million yuan will be paid, and Xiaogang Feng will pay 235 million yuan to Jiaxing Brothers. Many netizens have left messages on the message board, saying that Xiaogang Feng is really not suitable for project investment, and has lost money twice in a row. Let's concentrate on filming and don't touch the business of project investment and individual stocks. It's really deep.

Xiaogang Feng really doesn't understand project investment? Actually, it's not exactly like this. Indeed, as reported, the service commitment to Huayi Brothers at that time was 270 million yuan short, but don't forget that Huayi Brothers paid 65.438+005 billion yuan in assets when recycling Dongyang Milla, less 270 million yuan of all compensation, and more than 800 million yuan was in Xiaogang Feng's pocket. It seems that Xiaogang Feng lost, but in fact, he worked hard most of the time. As long as the bet of no more than one billion is unsuccessful, Xiaogang Feng is the home court. what do you think?