The vice principal in charge of teaching asked him how long it would take to prepare lessons. He read the text and said that one hour was enough. Well, it will be really excellent, of course, there is nothing to say. But the fact is basically impossible, especially for Chinese teachers. Our headmaster teaches Chinese and is not satisfied with all our Chinese teachers. Under the leadership of such a demanding principal, the Chinese teacher is not idle. It is extremely difficult for these Chinese teachers to find fault with you. No one is perfect, and the class is not finished. You want to come up with a perfect class in an hour. Are you a fairy?
There are also some performances: no self-introduction before class, which is the basic requirement of the school, and the vice principal will explain it before class. You'd better turn off your cell phone in class and never answer the phone. If you forget to turn off your phone, you'd better turn it off in time when others are on the phone, so as not to let others call again to disturb the class. This is all based on consciousness. Busy leaders are easy to get carried away. Strolling in other people's territory without saying hello to anyone. Don't pay attention to appearance and dress, thinking that talented people don't cut their hair or trim their edges.
Second, the classroom should be focused, which is the basic requirement. But in the real classroom, it is also a common problem to be reluctant to lose that share. Try to talk for no more than 30 minutes. If you want to talk about everything, you can only scratch the surface. Teachers who teach in technical secondary schools have more serious problems in this respect. There is a teacher who has a hard time in class. It is futile to write on the blackboard only from the author's introduction and article level. What era is it now? It is still the era of manual copying. It's still a classroom in the 1980s. All irrigation, all plagiarism. Even if you exert yourself, you can neither highlight the key points nor show your own specialties, killing two birds with one stone.
Third, tell me your deep understanding of the article. It should be noted that to be good at inspiring and inducing students, we must pay attention to the audience, thinking that the following are college students who come to listen to the lecture. Last year, a university teacher tried to give a lecture on Venus of Milos, giving a 40-point lecture on aesthetics. After the lecture, the headmaster said there was no need to evaluate the class. Master or doctor should pay special attention to this tendency when trying to give lectures. Because they are too knowledgeable, they tend to ignore the reality of middle school students, do not engage in inspiration and induction, and talk in a fog. Such people are not suitable for middle school teaching, and schools certainly don't want them. To correct this problem, you must have some teaching experience in middle school. Therefore, a master who does not stand on the platform of a middle school may not succeed if he wants to enter a good middle school, unless others use it otherwise.
Fourth, don't talk too much about article study. Some teachers have done some research on article learning. Therefore, when analyzing the text, they pay great attention to the anatomy of the article form, such as rhetoric, writing techniques, article characteristics, cohesion, description classification, classification and application of expression techniques, and article appreciation methods. These things are not forbidden, but they should not be the focus of the class. The teacher who said that preparing lessons only took one hour made this mistake. He has a good foundation and is good at writing articles. Results The whole class dissected the structure and layout of words and sentences according to his knowledge of article study. Break it into pieces. That sounds reasonable. At the end of the class, everyone thought that his understanding and analysis of the ideological content of the article was not in place, and he only dissected it from the technical level.
Five, to sum up (for others' reference, but also for your own reference when preparing for the open class), try to do the following aspects in the lecture:
1. Keep your head down and be modest. No matter you are a leader or an ordinary teacher, you should pay attention to your words and deeds. A cow will capsize.
2, the lecture should be passionate, if the intonation is insufficient, at least the voice should be loud. Mandarin is a little more standard.
3. The speed of speaking and writing should not be too slow. Too slow, people will doubt your efficiency. Not too bad.
4, to use computers, to keep up with the pace of the times, the network era, teachers who do not use computers in class will be eliminated.
5. The focus of the class is prominent, and one or two points is enough. If you don't talk about the rest, you can't cover everything.
6. There should be interaction between teachers and students. Even if you give a lecture to the teacher, you should also reflect the activities of the students. Full house irrigation has long been out of date.
7. Don't overdo it. The teacher only asks a few questions, but lets the students discuss them. Finally, the teacher doesn't make a profound summary.
8. The formal beauty of the article and the knowledge of writing can be said, but it is not the point. These things don't reflect your level.
9. Dig deep into the text and have original opinions on the ideological content. This is the most difficult and important, it reflects the level of teachers.
PS: article study's knowledge is like a master key and a scalpel, which can be used to dissect any article. However, in addition to the structural writing characteristics, the article also has its own feelings and thoughts, and teachers must lead students to appreciate and think together. If every class focuses on learning knowledge through articles, both students and teachers will get bored. That kind of class is only suitable for unit summary.
On the last point: the classroom form is easy to learn, but the understanding and analysis of the text is not so easy. A teacher had a good lesson. When someone asked him how long it would take to prepare lessons, he said, "I spent my whole life preparing this lesson, and the time for preparing lessons directly was 15 minutes." Teachers' performance in class is a kind of accumulation, not just a matter of skill. Without a deep understanding and analysis of the text, it is impossible to conquer the professional judges who are picky.
How to deeply analyze thoughts and feelings? We can work hard from the following two aspects. First, enter the book. Put yourself in the author's shoes and think about why he thought like that at that time (this is also the reason why we should introduce the writing background of the article before class), and what is the significance of writing the article like that, so as to accurately understand the author's intention and grasp the center of the article. Second, publish a book. Contact other people's point of view or current situation (society or oneself) and examine the author's thoughts with modern eyes. Read the article alive, jump out of the article, don't stick to the author's thoughts, argue with the author, learn dialectically and use it flexibly.
No matter how good the class is, people can find fault. Chinese itself is criticized in a mess, and various theories are mixed, such as the problem of interaction. Now, most people say that anger in class is active, but some people say that the most important thing in interaction is spiritual interaction. In this respect, a wonderful Chinese class is much better than superficial interaction.
Since everyone likes it, let's add some more.
1, the idea of the article is not the point. The idea of general articles is very clear, and high school students can see it clearly, so it doesn't need to be the focus of the class. In junior high school, teachers like to tell the general idea of paragraphs, and in high school, teachers just need to click. )
2. Get to the point as soon as possible. Tell the key points in detail (that is, the places that can shine), otherwise the lead is too long and too many other miscellaneous things will dilute the key points. During the trial lecture, you can omit the minor contents such as the introduction of the writer's works and the word check.
3, dig deep into the key points, and then click on other parts of the article to tick off the overall idea of the article, giving people a sense of integrity.
4. When analyzing key paragraphs, we should focus on key sentences and keywords, so as to be concrete and practical, otherwise it will be difficult to make it clear. The analysis cannot proceed carefully. If you want to analyze it carefully, you must stay in the text, so that you can stick to the textbook and not make the mistake of being divorced from the text.
5, play too much, too much will dilute the theme. Or more directly, lectures, like writing articles, focus on the center (key points) and try to talk less or no nonsense (which can arouse students' interest).