1, principle of objectivity and justice:
The interviewer's evaluation of the candidates should be based on the actual behavior of the candidates in the leaderless group discussion, and graded in strict accordance with the evaluation factors and scoring standards.
2, the principle of comprehensiveness:
The interviewer's evaluation of the candidate should be based on all the behaviors of the candidate in the leaderless group discussion, and should not draw conclusions about the performance of the candidate just based on some behaviors. Therefore, the performance evaluation is usually conducted at the end of the group discussion.
3, the interviewer qualification principle:
Interviewers must have certain qualifications and have received relevant training. Unqualified people, regardless of their positions, cannot be interviewers. At the same time, when grading the specific leaderless group discussion, there should also be training for the topic, so that all interviewers are very familiar with all the materials and problems of the topic, thus ensuring the consistency of grading.
4, the process is more important than the result principle:
In the evaluation of the results, the interviewer should pay attention to the evaluation according to the performance and reaction of each candidate in the whole discussion process (such as the tendency to persuade others, the ability to control the discussion rhythm, etc.). ), and don't care too much about the candidate's final discussion results.
Measurement dimensions and methods of leaderless group discussion;
1, evaluation dimension of leaderless group discussion:
Leaderless group discussion focuses on creating an interactive situation for candidates, so it emphasizes the ability characteristics of candidates in the discussion process, that is, it emphasizes the process dimension. The content dimension with background information as the main carrier, if handled properly, will also provide a lot of valuable information for evaluating candidates.
2. Evaluation method without leading group discussion:
Each examiner scores each evaluation factor of each candidate. Different examiners rate the evaluation factors of different candidates. The examiners graded certain elements of each candidate separately. When it is implemented, certain methods will be selected according to the examiner's level and professional knowledge.