We know that auditing is a very abstract subject. After reading the book, we don't know what we are reading. After finishing the question, we don't know what the questioner is talking about. What is more exaggerated is that the evaluation gap is very large. Often candidates feel that they can get 80 after the exam, but their score is only 50. So I suggest you:
(1) Don't do real questions easily. True questions are the most valuable means to test the review effect. Doing one thing at first and not doing another, checking the answers, is equivalent to leaving an impression when you don't understand, and you can't think like doing a new question next time. Similarly, it is meaningless to blindly engage in sea tactics. How? Look at the following two points
(2) Be sure to listen to the exercises class. I took the exam twice, once 60- once 60+. Thank the teacher for grading me.
(3) Work hard on reciting, not remembering individual keywords, but systematically memorizing them. Important test sites should achieve such an effect: several small points below the big point can be mapped into two directions, that is to say, when you see the big point, you will know the small point below, and when you see one of the big points, you will know which big point it belongs to. Don't try to write more without deducting points. There is no time at all, and there is not enough time to think.
As for the audit teacher, I suggest you choose Chen Lisheng. She has more than 20 years' teaching experience, which is extremely rich. Since 1996, Mr. Chen has been engaged in CPA and MBA teaching in Fudan University, Jiaotong University, Macau University, Shanghai Academy of Sciences and other universities. Since 2006, he has served as a pre-audit tutor for certified public accountants in Shanghai University of Finance and Economics and Lixin Accounting College, and also served as a full-time training teacher for new employees of PricewaterhouseCoopers.