Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Why do parents trust off-campus training institutions? Is their teacher better than the school teacher?
Why do parents trust off-campus training institutions? Is their teacher better than the school teacher?
First of all, why do parents believe in extracurricular training?

Because in-service teachers are not allowed to make up lessons, and some parents have the need to make up lessons, they can only choose off-campus training.

Besides, which level is higher, foreign training institutions or school teachers?

Generally speaking, the level of school teachers is definitely higher than that of training institutions. Let's analyze the reasons for the actual situation and illusion.

0 1 Comparison of professional level between school teachers and social guidance teachers 1. Teachers have different starting points.

As a national educational institution, public schools have a minimum entrance threshold. All teachers must obtain a teacher qualification certificate, which also requires academic qualifications. So relatively speaking, the basic teaching level of school teachers is relatively guaranteed.

However, the training institutions are uneven, and there is no unified guarantee for this faculty. Except for some large-scale training institutions that developed earlier and accumulated original funds, they may be able to recruit relatively good teachers. Generally, small training institutions often employ one or two excellent public teachers as representatives, and then invite some retired teachers, college students or newly graduated students. The vast majority of famous normal students (such as six publicly-funded normal students) will choose to enter public schools. Those who go to private schools are often local-level normal graduates. You can see the reason by looking down.

Second, the training of teachers is different.

In addition to classroom teaching, teachers in public schools also have teaching and research, which is precisely the shortcoming of private training institutions. Teachers in public schools have teaching and research activities of teachers in the same school almost every week, and there is a municipal teaching and research activity once a month. Every semester, there are once or twice lectures or teaching seminars by famous experts from all over the country or the whole province. Every year, some teachers are arranged to go out for study and training. There are countless online trainings. In addition, all schools have pairing guidance between old teachers and new teachers to help new teachers grow up quickly.

What are these training contents?

One is the theoretical knowledge of education and teaching, and most expert lectures are about this.

Second, the methods and skills of education and teaching are often obtained by listening to high-quality classes.

Third, the handling and control of the content of teaching materials are often discussed by municipal teaching and research meetings.

Fourthly, local and national examination directions and laws were discussed. This is mostly discussed at the municipal teaching and research meeting.

Fifth, the discussion of teaching characteristics and teaching methods is often the teacher's attendance and evaluation at school.

In addition, the school also involves the principle and control analysis of the test paper life system (school teachers require high-quality original test paper life system, generally not studying in private institutions, but downloading it online). There are also seminars to deal with students' learning disabilities and so on.

It is impossible for private institutions to provide such a huge operating mechanism, and the cost and energy spent are beyond the capacity of private training institutions.

Third, the differences of teachers' teaching methods.

Teachers in public schools are generally in a circular system, that is, they often take students from grade one to graduation and then bring them back from grade one. Especially in junior high school and senior high school. What are the advantages of doing so?

In this way, after one or two rounds, the teacher will have an overall grasp of the knowledge system of the whole learning period. When teaching a chapter of knowledge, we should not simply talk about this section of knowledge, but look at teaching methods from the height of a discipline system.

Some people will say that the training of teachers has also expanded in the classroom. The teaching method of subject knowledge system in public schools is not expansion, but the choice of knowledge and the change of teaching thought. Not in the same breath as knowledge expansion.

Therefore, the knowledge of teachers in public schools is often systematic and disciplinary as a whole, and different knowledge teaching methods are different.

On the contrary, it is difficult for teachers in private institutions to reach this level.

Fourth, the number of excellent teachers varies greatly.

From the above two or three points, every teacher in every public school is polished like this. So there are many excellent teachers in any public school. It can be said that except for a few teachers in each subject, as long as they have taught for two rounds (junior high school), almost all of them are excellent teachers. If an excellent teacher asks for leave, he can immediately replace it with another teacher, which is not inferior at all.

However, due to the lack of multi-channel training mechanism for teachers, it is almost difficult for private schools to produce excellent teachers. Therefore, private institutions tend to hire excellent teachers from public schools with high salaries. However, how many can private institutions dig?

And the operating mode of public schools has been decided. After poaching several excellent teachers, excellent teachers can be trained through two rounds of training. However, private institutions will always have only those teachers who have been poached. Far below the number of outstanding teachers in public schools.

Why do you feel that the teachers in private training institutions are better? First, the biggest reason is that teachers in private institutions take advantage of teachers in public schools. What does this mean?

Because students study in public schools first and then go to training institutions, teachers in public schools have laid a knowledge base and training for students in learning methods. Simply put, teachers in public schools spend a lot of energy to make students master 60%~70% knowledge. Then students go to private institutions to supplement what they can't learn in public schools, which naturally increases on the original basis. It can also be said that private training institutions stand on the shoulders of public schools and improve students' grades little by little.

This is far from indicating that the teaching level of teachers in private institutions is better than that of public teachers. If students are diligent and eager to learn, they can make up for these insufficient knowledge and improve their grades in public schools.

The reason why these students didn't improve their grades in public schools is that they didn't ask their teachers and lacked communication with them.

Conversely, if teachers in private institutions and public schools are allowed to teach students from scratch, teachers in private institutions cannot teach teachers in public schools on a large scale.

Second, teachers in public schools and private institutions teach knowledge in different ways.

Teachers in private institutions often focus on the application of knowledge points and problem-solving skills.

Teachers in public schools often have to talk about the occurrence and development of knowledge first, and also consider the connection with subsequent knowledge. With this knowledge connection, students can understand the problem-solving skills and knowledge application of the training teacher. Otherwise, it is impossible to understand the training teacher's lecture without knowledge connection as the basis. Then there is no problem of improving grades.

On the other hand, it is because the teacher of the training class mainly tells the students the exam-related questions and lets them imitate them. Therefore, students can apply these methods to solve problems in exams. I think it's improved.

However, teachers in public schools can't just talk about the types of exams. Teachers must speak all the knowledge, so that students can establish a complete framework of subject knowledge. This is to cultivate discipline. On this basis, we will deal with the exam again.

Thirdly, another factor is that teachers in public schools have to deal with a large number of students, and it is impossible for all students to pay attention.

The teaching of teachers in public schools faces many students. The teaching process can only be implemented with reference to 60% students with average grades. This will lead to the latter part of the students don't understand, these students don't take the initiative to ask the teacher, and their grades will be poor.

Make-up class is a training institution for teachers to teach according to students' knowledge level, so it is of great help to these students.

Finally, it is clear that parents think that the teaching level of teachers in training institutions is high because the publicity of training institutions is flying all over the sky. In fact, students not only study in public schools, but also go to training institutions for training, and finally get results, but training institutions publicize all the credit for good results as their own.

How can students learn less knowledge than training institutions when they spend more time in school?

Most of the questions in a test paper are learned in public schools, and only a few questions are not learned in schools, but are being trained in mechanism. How can you bet all your exam results on training institutions?

It can only be said that the publicity of training institutions is everywhere. From the Internet to the Internet, there are leaflets and advertisements everywhere.