The most ideal thing is, of course, that every student can occupy the top-level and completely consistent educational resources, complete the basic process of learning and tapping the potential as the next generation of human beings fairly, and accept the choices of human society fairly under the full educational guarantee provided by the government.
However, because such political dimensions (such as consanguinity, closeness, etc.) still play a huge role in the allocation of resources, and even play a role that obviously exceeds the scale of justice, most students are actually not qualified to complete a completely fair educational process;
Although a small number of students have achieved excellent academic results under poor economic and learning conditions because of their higher talents, they will inevitably encounter more outrageous and unfair resource allocation in the process of employment.
If extracurricular training is important, we often mean that the educational resources provided by the government are not enough to effectively tap the potential of students, and the glorious mission of tapping a fresh life potential needs to be completed through the supplement of educational resources;
Although doing so will undoubtedly lead to? Unfair distribution of educational resources? So that students with completely different economic accumulation in the past can't stand on the same starting line in the low-level learning stage, compare their academic qualifications fairly, and accept the screening of higher-level hierarchical education system of human beings fairly.
But on the other hand, in fact, we can also think of extracurricular training as? Special hierarchical education system? . As a market-oriented commodity, it only provides educational services for families (their children) with higher income levels. In this view, what does extracurricular training bring? Unfair education? I'm afraid I wouldn't be so criticized.
However, this understanding of extracurricular training (resulting in unfair distribution of educational resources) does seem a bit excessive. Deceive yourself? .
Like everywhere? Choosing a school student? In that case, objectively speaking, the secondary distribution of educational resources brought by social educational resources (extracurricular training) is very unfavorable to talent selection.