I'm going to take the director exam next year. I don't know how to review for the art test. I wonder if it is worth spending money on cram school. I hope to add the advantages and disadvantages of the art test. Generally speaking, the director's art test consists of several parts: literary knowledge, professional concepts, film analysis, story writing, copy planning and so on.

Professional training courses are necessary, unless there are professionals at home to guide, professional things are difficult to grasp.

For personal film reviews, one is to watch movies (pay more attention to movies, TV series and even TV programs and advertisements), the other is to practice (there is still a difference between writing a film review story and writing, which needs more infiltration), and there are things to memorize in artistic common sense (such as what is montage, how many scenes are divided, what is the effect of silhouette, etc.). ) ~

Advantages of art examination: give full play to your interest (if you have hobbies or ambitions, you can completely satisfy your wishes), save the country by curve (compared with the college entrance examination, the cultural requirements are lower, and there are more opportunities for selection and admission), cultivate aesthetic feeling (you will have a deeper understanding and attention to artistry), and increase your knowledge (you can meet more people with different personalities and experience more different things, so that your brain and life will not be too rigid).

Disadvantages of the art test: delay time (because it may involve training, entrance examination, etc. Naturally, it will consume more time to review cultural classes than other students, and waste money (the registration fee for the exam, accommodation and transportation during the exam, and even the tuition fees in the future are not small expenses).

I hope to accept the answer, thank you ~