Personally, I think it is necessary, but I don't force others to agree with me.

Regarding the education of primary school students, in fact, I think this problem is a common phenomenon, but every family will have different views on education, so there will be different educational results. In fact, there is no unified answer to education, and everyone is trying to find the right direction.

Many people object to taking training courses when they are young.

For those children who are about to go to primary school, because they have not learned enough knowledge in kindergarten, parents hope that they can improve their children's learning ability by attending cram schools. Many people object to this way, they will think that it deprives children of their freedom, because they will think that children of this age need happiness more than the so-called study.

I think it is necessary to take a training class.

I am not an advocate of happy education. On the contrary, I advocate training children with corresponding skills so that they can acquire the ability to achieve themselves. For many kindergartens now, kindergartens really can't teach children enough knowledge, so that children don't know how to learn at all in primary school, and they don't have the knowledge and skills to learn. I am not against happy education, but I think happy education also deprives children of learning opportunities to some extent.

Happy education is not an education to cultivate ordinary people.

For those families above the middle class, these families clearly know how children can learn to live a good life. Happy education is really good, but it is not enough for us to accept it all. For those children who are about to enter primary school, it is far more useful to do something beneficial to their lives than to make them free and happy.

I also know that everyone has different views on education, so their performance in educational methods is different. I don't force others to agree with me. The above is just my personal opinion.