The concept of "poor men and rich women" seems to have become the knowledge of many parents, so I think we should treat this concept dialectically.
answer
First, it is reasonable. As the saying goes, "If the sky is a great responsibility to the people of Sri Lanka, we must first work hard on their minds and bones." A boy who has been raised in poverty since childhood can exercise his hard-working quality and develop his excellent quality of hard-working, hard-working and brave in taking responsibility as soon as possible. The youth's diligence and thrift will be of great benefit to his future work, contact with society and family formation. Enriching girls can make them know how to decorate their lives from an early age and gain physical and mental elegance and beauty. Superior living conditions will play a good role in distinguishing right from wrong, resisting temptation and distinguishing right from wrong when they grow up.
Second, there is also an unreasonable side. We should pay attention to methods and measures in everything. If you don't master it well, it may be counterproductive. If boys suffer hardships too early, it will not only cast a shadow over their childhood life, but also make them develop bad characters of inferiority, meanness, timidity and cowardice, which will have an irreversible impact on their later lives. Similarly, if a girl is overnourished, it may make her mentally immature, suffer from princess disease, live in a fairy tale world all day, and dare not face the reality of society bravely. Moreover, too much material supply will also make her develop the bad habit of pampering and extravagance, which is likely to form the wrong concept of money worship and material IQ in the future, which is not conducive to the growth of children.
Third, the key is to return to education. Whether it is "poor support" or "rich support", in the final analysis, it is only a means adopted by parents to achieve educational goals. This method is just a tool, and the key depends on whether the user of the tool can correctly master the use method. Confucius said that "education has no class", but it seems a bit simple and arbitrary to take gender as a one-size-fits-all standard. Suppose that if the whole family is committed to providing a girl with superior material conditions, but does not teach her some basic principles of being a man, can she learn to be frugal, and can she form these precious qualities of gratitude, sympathy and pity? Therefore, parents must master the correct educational ideas and methods and adopt various educational methods, so that children can gradually understand the quality of self-improvement and courage to take responsibility and cultivate a knowledgeable and tasteful life temperament in the process of leading by example, teaching by example and persuasion. This is the ultimate goal of education.
Group interview questions (2) There are two views on social relations: first, some people ask others to do well, but they can't do well; There is also a view that oneself is the environment of others. Talk about your own views in combination with reality.
answer
This is my understanding of these two sentences in the title.
In the first sentence, some people ask others to do it well, but they can't do it well. Regarding this sentence, I think of a sentence called "be strict with yourself and be lenient with others", but the funny thing is that many people in real life belong to the type of "be strict with yourself". Everyone will stand at the commanding heights of morality or standards when asking others, hoping that others will be a person with noble morality and unparalleled ability, but they ignore all kinds of difficulties and obstacles that may be encountered in doing things, so the requirements will be idealized and difficult to operate and complete. However, when you do it yourself, you will often be restricted by practical difficulties such as lack of your own ability, resources and supporting facilities. Only then do you know that it is easier said than done, and only then do you know how difficult it is to set an example and serve others with your own abilities.
Second, you are someone else's environment. People who can see themselves as the environment of others are often gentlemen with high moral standards and civilized behaviors. Because these people know the importance of "setting an example", they have a proactive sense of responsibility and good self-discipline. They demand and restrain their behavior and morality with the concept of protecting the ecological environment, and strive to create a clear and clean external environment for others.
He took bribes and pursued pleasure, but asked others to be honest and clean at the clean government meeting; Insufficient investment in work, perfunctory, but asking others to work hard and work overtime. As the saying goes, "correct yourself first." Imagine that even you can't be strict with yourself and take the lead. It is conceivable that how do these people convince the public of their words and deeds? In my opinion, if you want to be a qualified public official, you must deeply understand the traditional Confucian spirit of "being strict with yourself and being lenient with others", implement the main responsibility consciousness of "being a good scenery", be strict with yourself in work and study, be more understanding and tolerant when getting along with others, and be less critical and calculating, so as to become a good young man recognized by the people and accepted by colleagues.
Group interview question (3) Now the stock market is very hot, and young people are scrambling to enter the market. How to treat this phenomenon?
answer
China stock market is very hot recently. Not only many old investors have returned to the stock market, but many young people are also busy opening accounts to enter the market. At that time, the securities hall was crowded and very lively. For young people to participate in the stock market, there are praises and disappointments in the media, which I personally understand.
First, should young people buy stocks? This should start with the stock market itself. The stock market is a modern financial system derived from the development of human society and economy to a certain stage. A healthy stock market plays a very important and positive role in the development of national economy and enterprises. Young people come into contact with all walks of life after work, and the stock market is a window for young people to understand finance and learn to invest and manage money. Through stock trading, young people can exercise modern financial system, company operation, risk awareness, psychological quality, wealth concept, information collection and identification ability, and these valuable experiences are not easy to learn in school textbooks. Moreover, young people are now under great pressure to survive, and the desire to preserve and increase wealth through stock trading is understandable. From this perspective, the behavior of young people in stock trading should not be killed with a stick. Second, why are young people prone to tragedy in stock trading? Many media and parents are firmly opposed to young people's stock trading, and there are certain reasons. After all, young people have little savings, a weak foundation, and poor economic endurance and risk resistance. Once they lose money in stock trading, they will be hit hard. The most serious thing is that young people do not fully understand society, and the correct concept of wealth has not yet been formed. They often equate the stock market with a place for speculation and gambling. They are obsessed with the stock market, forget to eat and sleep, waste a lot of time and energy, and seriously affect their health and work and study. Some people borrow money for stock trading after being quilted, and some young investors have weak psychological endurance and choose to commit suicide after losing money. Therefore, many parents resolutely keep their children away from stocks, which is actually a kind of conservatism and a kind of deep care.
Third, my point of view. I think young people should actively understand stocks and treat them with caution. Why do you use "should" in the first half of the sentence? It is because young people want to broaden their horizons and deepen their understanding of all walks of life in society. New things and technologies emerge one after another. Young people don't have to speculate in stocks, but they should pay attention to and learn some basic modern financial knowledge. In modern society, if they don't understand the basic knowledge of economics and investment and financial management, they can't keep up with the times. Why do you use "OK" in the second half of the sentence, and why do you use "contact with stocks" instead of "stock trading" because I think young people should adopt a cautious attitude and must fully understand the sentence "The stock market is risky and you must be cautious when entering the market". Don't be obsessed with the stock market as a speculative game that guarantees no loss, and touch the stock moderately within your financial and psychological endurance. The most important thing is to distinguish between primary and secondary, and don't put the cart before the horse and reverse the relationship between stock trading and work and study. This is the proper state of young people's stock trading.
People who have seen the "group interview questions" have also seen:
1. Group interview questions
2. The topic of collective stress interview