Candidates are generally in a state of extreme tension in the examination room, with blank heads and short circuits. Many candidates will unconsciously repeat the last sentence or words in order to avoid blank space. Although they made up for the short circuit of their own thinking and bought time for the next sentence, they were extremely uncomfortable and even impatient. The examiner's attention is not on the examinee, and the number of repetitions is virtually reminding the examiner to pay attention to himself. To overcome this habit, it is suggested to use pause instead of repetition, and say it completely when you think about it. Just like a leader's speech, although the speech speed is slow and the pause is long, the listener is happy.

Second, don't "barrage"

"Rapid-fire" speech will increase the fun of life and enliven the atmosphere in the usual chat, but it is really a taboo in the interview. A quiet examination room needs a harmonious atmosphere. The "rapid-fire" expression not only makes the communication between candidates and examiners lose everything, but also gives examiners a sense of oppression, and sometimes gives people the illusion that they have beaten chicken blood. Inequality dialogue naturally fails to achieve the expected results. Candidates need to weigh carefully whether they want to be a person with a faster mouth than their brains or a person with a faster brain than their mouths.

Third, don't "recite"

"Rapid fire" is too strong in momentum, while "reciting" as a performance of ignoring the examiner is "inattention". Usually, the examinee's eyes do not communicate with the examiner, and they turn up and down or left and right, that is, they avoid the examiner's eyes. In fact, in the final analysis, it is a kind of nervous performance. Candidates want to try to recall the outline constructed in their brains, for fear of missing something, which will bring immature performance to the examiner.

Fourth, don't be a mother-in-law.

Perfectionists are usually very demanding of themselves, and such candidates are not uncommon in the examination room. Mainly manifested in confusion of thinking, talking about meaning and countermeasures when answering comprehensive analysis questions, and talking about meaning after talking about countermeasures. It seems comprehensive, but it lacks logic. The second performance is that there is no concept of time. Many candidates allocate the same time to the three questions, and even leave the essence to the last question. When time is reminded, perfectionists still don't choose to finish it quickly, but take their time to answer until the examiner stops. The result is that the integrity of the answer is destroyed, which will undoubtedly reduce the score.

Fifth, don't be "cynical"

Under excessive tension, some candidates are too cramped or even stiff, but some candidates try to relax their bodies or expressions, but it is counterproductive. Small gestures such as raising eyebrows, glancing at examiners, shaking legs and turning pens are also common, which will directly make examiners feel that candidates have incorrect attitudes, despise the examination room and disrespect the examiners, and their impression will be reduced. Therefore, candidates suggest videos when practicing, and usually everyone is very conscious.