Author: Rao with the pace of school education, extracurricular training institutions have mushroomed. It should be said that this is a powerful supplement to school education, but there are still some differences in specific details: First, the teaching methods are different. When the school teaches new knowledge, the teacher prepares lessons well, including courseware, teaching ideas and teaching steps, to ensure that most students digest new knowledge; In contrast, there is no need for training institutions to do so, because most students come to cram schools to consolidate their knowledge. If we reinterpret the school process, students will feel impatient. At this time, the correct way for the teacher is to go through the knowledge points quickly, and then master the knowledge points through the classic questions. From this perspective, the teaching of training institutions should be a fragment of school teaching. Second, the teaching objectives are slightly different. At this time, some people don't understand. How can there be a difference? Isn't it all about making students progress? I don't deny this, but progress includes intellectual education and intellectual education. It should be said that schools do better in moral education than the training industry, because if everyone in a class is a troublemaker, a lot of work can't be carried out, so teachers need to establish a good class atmosphere from moral education. Compared with the training industry, school teachers are not sensitive to students' grades. He just needs to train a few top students. Parents come to complain, and the teacher directly takes out the test report card. Not because I don't teach well, but because of your children. Studying in the same class, why can others achieve such excellent results? Didn't you say that your parents picked up a stone and threw it at their own feet? Imagine: next time, is it possible for him to complain to the teacher? On the contrary, the training industry only talks about achievements. The background of this situation is: first, training belongs to the service industry, and consumers' psychological expenditure will certainly achieve good results; Second, there are many training institutions and too many choices. Third, there are differences in communication with students. In everyone's impression, school teachers are serious, and teachers in training institutions are easy-going. This is all determined by the nature of the profession. In school, the authority of teachers should not be provoked, and they all have prestige in the hearts of students. Communicating with students is more about the patient teaching of teachers. If they are disobedient, it doesn't matter to criticize them severely, because students don't have the right to choose schools and teachers. The same thing happened in training institutions. I think it's handled in a completely different way. We can only adopt the policy of "Huairou", and we can't and can't tolerate our own sharpness, because we want to retain customers. Fourth, the teacher's mood is different. It should be said that school teachers want to be more comfortable and have a sense of belonging and identity, because other things are not for teachers to worry about except teaching, correcting homework and preparing lessons; In the training industry, the relative pressure should be greater, first from academic pressure, and second from the pressure to retain customers. At this time, the quality of students' reaction often becomes a barometer of teachers' mood in training institutions, and they are more likely to feel tired. The existence of things is reasonable. Why is the training industry in full swing so prosperous? The reasons are as follows: first, students with poor grades can't keep up with class, so they can only hope that training institutions can help them shorten the gap; Second, it is difficult for students with excellent grades to have room for improvement by school teaching. I hope training institutions can help them stand out from the crowd. Third, students with average grades hope to help them achieve excellent transformation with the help of extracurricular teachers. It is not difficult to see that the training industry is a very good remedy for the shortage of traditional teaching. It is probably beneficial to the healthy and orderly development of the training market to make the society less complaining and more understanding of training teachers. Source address:/news/67201012213719.html Source: Shenzhen Teacher Talent Network.

Hope to adopt