It reflects that in the face of life and death, although people's desire for survival is endless, they can't do anything about death when they ask for help. Of course, the death of this asthmatic old man will make his family sad and even cause resentment, but the object of resentment should be careful. On the surface, the doctors in the 120 ambulance did not allow the family members to ask for help, which led to the sick elderly not being treated in time. Doctors will also be supervised and controlled by relevant systems in the process of performing first aid tasks, which is easily overlooked by many people, making doctors the scapegoat of this tragedy.

The cause of the incident is not complicated. The old man with asthma needs a defibrillator in first aid. At this time, the passing 120 ambulance has become the savior that the elderly's families are eager to see. We assume that if defibrillators were provided at that time, there is still the possibility that the elderly will not be rescued. After all, the medical staff who did nucleic acid testing at the scene of the incident were the ones who rescued the elderly. For the doctors on 120 ambulance, on the one hand, they need to be responsible for the patients who make emergency calls, on the other hand, they need to meet the emergency requests of the elderly with asthma. Under the objective situation that the epidemic situation is extremely severe, it is impossible to make such a choice, which also reflects the huge problems existing in the current medical assistance system from an objective perspective.

As enthusiastic people, they may think that the doctor gave a defibrillator, which will not affect the rescue of another critically ill patient, but no one can guarantee the credibility of this assumption, which shows that everyone takes their own interests as the core in the face of illness and death. Of course, the family members of patients who make emergency calls may be affected by the current situation and agree to rescue them. However, in the face of emergency management mechanism, the opinions of family members are not referential. In the event of an accident, I believe that family members will not give up their responsibilities because of their original oral opinions.

A seemingly black-and-white accident is not entirely true, but the family members of the deceased old man chose to speak out at this time, which is nothing more than venting their inner dissatisfaction, grievances and feelings, and has no substantive significance for the subsequent disposal of the whole matter. Whether it is the rigor of the first-aid mechanism, the indifference of the first-aid doctor, or the panic of the family members of the patients before the illness, it has been reflected in this accident.