Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Training of medical representatives in foreign companies
Training of medical representatives in foreign companies
Generally speaking, there are many patients in the cardiovascular field, the incidence rate is high, and the market is large, but the competition is fierce, and of course more is exercise.

The field of vaccines is greatly affected by the policy, and basically, one domestic product will die and one imported product will die. Moreover, vaccines are relatively limited, and there will be fewer companies and fewer jobs in the future.

Therefore, from the field, cardiovascular is recommended.

Both companies are big companies, but from the perspective of starting career development, Pfizer is still recommended. Because Pfizer's training, team and company system are relatively perfect and the industry is well-known, it is the best choice for newcomers. Novartis is chaotic, and there are good products and fields to consider jumping over to make money in the future. But this is something to consider after working at Pfizer for two years.

Young people who just graduated don't care what products and regions, because you can learn a lot from them. On the other hand, you can only find some old products and jobs in a small area. Which director of a foreign company will rest assured to recruit a new person with zero experience to do important markets and products. Therefore, the mentality must be good, not arrogant and impetuous. Down-to-earth study and practice is king. The key to making money in the future is to lay a good foundation: communication ability, execution ability, ways and means of dealing with people, sensitivity of observing words and feelings, ability to analyze fields and make plans, and ability to think, summarize and improve. These are the basic skills needed in future work, and the more solid the better.

Although development mainly depends on personal understanding and efforts, your supervisor is also very important, so the choice of these two positions should also consider your supervisor, how do you feel after the interview, and which one is more congenial (think back carefully on the interview process, eliminate the catering part, and find out what you really feel is congenial. )? Which background is better (education, conversation, work experience, current team stability, word of mouth)? If possible, you can also ask who has more management experience and better development momentum in the company.

Wish you success!