Dress code for the interview. Interview dress-the art of dress. Most people will choose a professional suit when they attend an interview, which is a relatively simple and safe choice. In the choice of suits, we should pay attention to the quality of suits. If you wear a suit with many threads and wrinkles to the interview, it will leave an informal impression and the whole person's state will be greatly reduced. Therefore, as long as conditions permit, try to choose a professional suit with fine workmanship and exquisite texture. Cool color is the best choice for male interview, which will leave the interviewer with a calm, firm, frank, simple, calm and responsible impression. Ladies can choose neutral colors and avoid too strong colors such as red. Don't think that shoes at the bottom won't be noticed. On the contrary, if you wear a pair of dirty or inappropriate shoes, others will find you at the first time. So, make sure your shoes are clean first. Girls had better wear black, brown or dark red shoes with heels, and the height should not exceed 7 cm. For boys, black leather shoes are a safer choice. Shoes must be comfortable. If you feel uncomfortable in these shoes, you will look uncomfortable. (Note: At present, the weather is cold everywhere. Candidates are advised to wear a thin sweater inside the suit and a cold-proof and warm coat outside, and then take off the coat before entering the interview room. Interview rooms are generally air-conditioned and not too cold. Second, the dress of the public interview-the choice of hairstyle No matter what the occasion, a properly trimmed hairstyle will give people a cordial and dignified feeling. Men's hair is easy to take care of. If you use hair gel, be sure to comb the tangled hair with a comb before you leave. If your hair is too long, you'd better get a haircut a few days in advance to let yourself have an adaptation process. The most important thing for a lady is not to wear too many headdresses. At the same time, don't do "explosive" hairstyle, which will make the interviewer instinctively reject you; High bun is also not desirable, which will make the interviewer tend to judge with Miss Gu's eyes, which is undoubtedly a denial of your job search. For a lady, the safest hairstyle is to tie her hair in a clean and tidy ponytail. Not too exaggerated curly hair is also a choice, giving people a mature and lively feeling, but we must take care of it in advance. (Note: If the lady has bangs, it is recommended to trim them above the eyebrows. The so-called fine features, this is the truth. If your hair blocks your eyebrows, the examiner will think you are not confident. Third, the dress for the interview-the makeup on the face during the interview must be light and natural, and it is best to slightly modify the cheeks to make yourself look healthy and refreshing. Eyes are the focus of emotional communication, and a pair of bright and confident eyes will definitely add a lot of color to your face. Reasonable lip modification can attract the examiner's attention and make him ignore other personal facial defects. Even men should wear a colorless lipstick to make their lips moist, and dry lips will give the examiner a feeling of rushing. Fourth, the dress of the civil servant interview-eliminating all kinds of shiny trinkets in the interview can really add a lot of color to you, but in the interview, it is best to eliminate them. The interviewer's eyes are very picky: if you are bejeweled, he will think that you are rich and keen on consumption, but not enthusiastic about your work; If you wear heavy make-up, he will think that you like dressing up and it is difficult to achieve anything at work; If you dress beautifully, he will think that your vanity is strong and your habits are conspicuous; You are eccentric in nature, and he will think that you are playful, unfocused and untrustworthy at work. In short, as long as you wear accessories, the interviewer has reason to make irresponsible remarks. Therefore, accessories should be eliminated in the interview. (Note: It is best for girls to choose bags with stable and soft colors, such as black, white, beige or crimson. Simple design, better texture with leather; Boys can carry black or dark brown briefcases. ) 5. Dress for the interview-don't wear more than five colors, and don't use too jumping colors. Too fancy collocation will give people an impression of being unpretentious and uninhibited. But that doesn't mean you can only live in "black, white and gray". Too dim a color will make you look lifeless. In terms of color, you can choose light blue, light pink or red. If the coat is dark, you can choose a brighter shirt; If the coat is brightly colored, choose a dark or white shirt to adjust it. Sixth, interview dress-the best dress for common ladies: 1. Dark clothing: gives people a sincere, steady and practical impression, but in order to avoid being dark all over and looking old-fashioned, you can decorate it with a pink shirt (low-necked bright sweater). 2. Tailor-made small suit (with straight dark trousers): one of the best choices for an interview, without being too fancy, just add a little detail and decoration to the basic model. 3. Suit: Naturally, it is a labor-saving and beautiful choice, and you don't have to worry about the collocation of upper and lower rooms. 4. Shirt: It is also one of the best choices for an interview. With a small suit, it looks mature and capable. 5. Generous skirt: A slightly moderate over-the-knee skirt makes women regain the warmth of the past, that is, without losing the modern lady style and naturally retaining the fashion atmosphere, which is a good choice for interview dress. 6. Skillful pants: Black (or brown) straight pants can bring you capable neutral charm, and are easy to match with various body shapes, which is also a good choice for interview dress. What do you think of job-hopping?

Analysis:

This is a typical social phenomenon topic, which requires candidates to make correct judgments and make reasonable explanations on things that exist in society. In the whole process of answering questions, we should pay attention to a main vein: that is, the nature of our exam is a specific police recruitment, and it is particularly important to recognize this phenomenon under the leadership of such a profession, so ... recently, a friend interviewed for the post of public security, so I specially collected some common questions about public security interviews. 1. What do you think of job-hopping? Analysis: This is a typical social phenomenon topic, which requires candidates to make correct judgments and make reasonable explanations on things that exist in society. In the whole process of answering questions, we should pay attention to a main vein: that is, the nature of our exam is a specific police exam, and it is particularly important to recognize this phenomenon under the leadership of such a profession. Therefore, our candidates should also pay attention to job matching while answering questions, so as to reflect the depth of answering questions and get a high score breakthrough. The idea of answering this question is: first, enter the question and make a conceptual analysis of the unique phenomenon mentioned in the topic, that is, explain the proper term "job-hopping" with personal understanding and cognition; Secondly, the social phenomenon of "job-hopping" is analyzed objectively, and it is suggested to make a comprehensive analysis from the background of the times, different stages of social cognition and different dimensions of social cognition, such as advocating individuality, promoting job-hopping, not avoiding employers' bad judgment on personal instability, and not mentioning job-hopping. Third, combined with my determination to be a good people's policeman, I generally want to show that I have chosen to work in the people's police industry carefully, so I don't advocate job-hopping and I won't, so I will give a comprehensive answer. 2. What would you do if you were asked to be a community policeman? Analysis: this is a topic that requires careful thinking and judgment of candidates to accurately locate. It is also a topic that is biased towards the assessment of practical operation ability, but it is by no means a simple job matching problem. Knowing this topic, candidates can stand out from the general candidates by grasping the discretion in their answers. The idea of answering this question: preconceived, that is, entering the post where you are really a community policeman, so as to carry out the following work step by step at the specific operational level, so that the examiner can feel the basic quality you need for a post. Secondly, after the country has done a good job, it is the specific operation to seek its own government. At this time, the general candidates will have a lot of thoughts, because everyone will have different steps and different ideas when doing a specific job. For example, they can answer: from the general operational level, first understand the people, things and things in the basic working environment, the different personnel structures in the communities under their jurisdiction, the history or current situation of some specific issues that the police are sensitive to, and the community public. Finally, I can express my hope in combination with my own subjectivity. For example, in such a seemingly ordinary job, I will pay more attention to the meticulous work, take better service for the people as the basic requirement of the work, and strive to be a community policeman who attracts the attention of the masses, reassures the leaders and cares for the masses. 3. Some people say that civil servants are service providers, while others say that civil servants are law enforcers. what do you think? Analysis: This is an examination question to examine how candidates understand the position of civil servants and correctly treat the rights entrusted by the people. It is not only to answer the judgment questions of the two clauses mentioned in the title, but also what kind of practical enlightenment it brings to you. Only by combining these elements can this question be answered, so candidates are required to pay attention to the cultivation of comprehensive analysis ability. The way to answer this question: First of all, the two statements mentioned in the title express different perceptions of the same object by different subjects. As a candidate who is about to become a national civil servant, he should have a comprehensive judgment and understanding. You can make a positioning according to your own cognition. For example, civil servants are both law enforcers and service providers. Second, comprehensively analyze that civil servants are both law enforcers and service providers. Explain from two aspects, that is, analyze why civil servants are law enforcers, because the state has given civil servants the power to manage public affairs at all levels of the country according to law, so civil servants are law enforcers, which can be taken as examples in taxation, justice and other industries. At the same time, the duty of national civil servants is to serve the people wholeheartedly, so civil servants should be good service providers. The height of analysis is ultimately determined by the service provider. Why? Can be expressed according to their own understanding, for example, it can be said that civil servants are law enforcers, and the core of law enforcement is to better serve the people. Candidates can also take other summary points that they think can be thoroughly analyzed to improve the summary. Thirdly, as a candidate who is about to become a national police, I want to put forward my own views based on my own position, such as "civil servants are law enforcers and service providers", that is, we should make good use of the power given to each of our people's police by the people to ensure that the people live and work in peace and contentment, so as to meet the requirements of our profession and better serve the people. 4. What do you think if people fight and you stop it, and someone looks at you and says you hit someone? Analysis: This is a typical scenario simulation emergency response topic. It should not be difficult for candidates to make some qualitative judgments after getting the questions, so the setting of the questions themselves is not too difficult to judge. Each candidate's wonderful answer to this question mainly depends on the content of the answers. The way to answer this question: first, we should have a perceptual understanding of this situation, and then make the most rational and reasonable judgment that best conforms to the quality of national civil servants in the fastest time. In this case, my first step must be to judge whether the situation I am facing is within my personal control, and then do the next step. Second, if I can judge through the quickest rational judgment that the person who hit me or other people is not malicious, and my method and attitude are wrong, which has caused such a wrong cognition to the other party, how can I solve it? If the result of the judgment is that the other party will attack me maliciously, then I will take the way of minimizing the loss. Every examinee has his own methods and specific ideas for dealing with specific problems, and we don't have a unified format. As long as it is reasonable and well-founded, we can solve problems. Third, we must have a certain depth to make the last point of this topic, so I suggest that every candidate should fully consider the particularity of this topic and our status as a qualified civil servant when making a statement in combination with himself, and treat the inevitable emergencies in future real work with a correct attitude.