Debate: Debate is the function of "Qi" in our ancient prose. Generally speaking, the simplest job is to recite clearly and clearly according to the theoretical viewpoints designed by our team in advance, requiring clear thinking and strong appeal, and just explain our theory for a round; After the argument, the opposing party makes a statement, which is usually used to explain his own point of view. If you react quickly, you can attack the loopholes in the positive argument moderately, but it is mainly to argue, and it is most important to clarify your own views first;
Debate: Debate is the "inheritance" function of our ancient prose. Since the two sides have already made statements in the first debate, the main arguments and arguments of both sides have been made clear. The main function of the second debate is to continue to state our views and answer the questions raised by the other side in the argument, so as to strengthen our views. The two positive arguments are stated first, and the two negative arguments are stated later. Both of them are a combination of narration and discussion, which shows that one side and the attacking side have both.
Three changes: Three changes are the role of "turning point" in our ancient prose. There has been a debate between the pros and cons, a debate. The three arguments can be changed from defending to attacking, not limited to their own arguments, and they can attack each other without losing their own city. If you can carry out a hearty attack, then the role of the "turning point" of the three debates will be achieved. Three positive arguments will be put forward first, and three negative arguments will be put forward after the meeting.
Free debate stage: in the free debate stage, the opposing side will speak first, and then the two teams will speak alternately. The total speaking time of the two teams is limited, and the time is counted separately. Whoever runs out first will shut up, hehe. Because the other party had the task of speaking before and had no time and energy to take care of the other party, the first shot of free debate was often released by the other party's four arguments. This is the melee stage of the debate, so let's play freely. If you can find the fundamental problem that the other party can't justify, you will often take the method of "surrounding the point", grab a question and ask it repeatedly, block all the explanations and refutations of the other party, and continue to attack the key points until the other party collapses.
Four Debates: Four Debates is the function of "combination" in our ancient prose. Take back our arguments and themes from the front, freely and freely. The four debates have two functions: first, it is the last chance for both sides to speak, so we must consolidate our views clearly, clearly and forcefully; Second, this is a summary statement of the debate between the two sides. It is based on the first three debates and the free debate. We can't ignore the situation on the court and the doubts of the other side, talk to ourselves and follow the script. Therefore, personally, four arguments are the most difficult to write. In the past, I personally prepared four debates, all of which took half the time to state our views, adopting a highly organized language model, such as: "Our views are: one is ... two is ... three is ... four is ... four is ... four is ... four is ... four is ... four is ... five is ... four is ...
Finally, it should be emphasized that the four arguments are: the opposing side argues first, and the positive side argues later. This is inconsistent with the previous statement order, and the content of the speech should be adjusted according to different situations. If it is the four arguments of the opposing side, we can put the strongest doubts and attacks on the opposing side's views near the end and add "I hope the opposing side will stop talking about him and avoid this issue." Please give us all a positive explanation! " In this case, let him take it, throw the bomb at the other side, and disrupt the established thinking and rhythm of the next four debates.