The state cut off extracurricular remedial classes, and the state implemented the policy of double reduction, trying to reduce the burden on students, but it was opposed by parents. The reason for parents' objection is that parents can't help their children because the extracurricular cram school is cancelled. Without extracurricular cram schools, teachers are unwilling to answer children's questions, and children will lose interest in learning.

1. Parents object to cutting off off-campus training courses. After-school remedial classes have mushroomed. After school, the students poured into extra-curricular classes. Students have no time to rest on weekends, and even many parents have their own time. Students have squeezed out the off-campus remedial classes, and there are more and more off-campus remedial classes and more and more teachers. Many students rely on extracurricular remedial classes.

Students have a heavy burden and great pressure. Therefore, the state has cut off extracurricular tutoring classes, and it is not allowed to provide extracurricular tutoring, so students should be decompressed. However, many parents are opposed to the state cutting off off-campus remedial classes because parents have their own concerns.

Second, parents are worried about canceling off-campus cram schools. Parents' ability to help their children's knowledge changes rapidly, and the content updated in textbooks needs to be gradual. Many parents simply have no ability to coach their children. Parents are opposed to cutting off off-campus training courses because they are worried that their children are not capable enough to coach their children and satisfy their thirst for knowledge.

Nowadays, children are under great academic pressure. Children have to finish a lot of homework every day. Children will encounter many problems. Parents can't help their children. Parents are anxious, but children are more anxious. In order not to affect children's grades, parents oppose the cancellation of off-campus remedial classes.

Third, parents are opposed to cutting off off-campus training courses. Parents are worried that teachers are unwilling to answer their children's questions. There is nothing wrong with parents' worries. Some irresponsible teachers are unwilling to answer children's questions in the face, which will affect children's curiosity for a long time. The children have lost interest in this subject. After a long time, children may break the jar and fall, which will affect their grades.

Some parents have strong interpersonal skills and can communicate well with teachers. Some parents have poor interpersonal skills and can't communicate well with teachers, which may lead to teachers wearing colored glasses to look after their children. Children will feel inferior, so their questions will not be answered, so parents will object to cutting off off-campus training courses.

Fourth, parents are opposed to cutting off off-campus training courses for fear that their children's problems will not be answered. Teachers will take care of most students at school, and the topics they talk about are very simple, while exams need to be done very high. Parents pin their hopes on off-campus training courses.

For a long time, students have improved their learning ability by going to off-campus training classes. Now that off-campus training courses have been cut off, parents are worried that their children's problems will not be answered, which will affect their performance for a long time. Once a child loses interest in learning, it will affect his grades. Parents are anxious, so parents don't want the state to cut off off-campus training courses. Some parents don't want their children to stay in school for too long, so they oppose cutting off off off-campus training institutions.