The first is to standardize discipline training fees. In fact, after the double reduction policy, many training institutions closed down, and the heads of many training institutions ran away with their parents' hard-earned money very irresponsibly. This is because some training institutions have no fee restrictions, and usually charge many parents a training fee of one year or two years. And these high training costs have led to many parents' courses not finished, but the money has been paid. Moreover, the cost of this money is not low, because such unreasonable charges lead to many parents' hard-earned money can not be recovered. When training institutions charge fees after training, they can standardize the charging mechanism of training institutions, so that more parents can spend their money on the cutting edge and where they should spend it.
Second, the fees of training institutions will be included in the fund supervision. Beijing encourages training institutions to train first and then charge, which also shows that the upfront fees of offline training institutions will be included in the fund supervision. Because generally speaking, if you want to study, you must hand in a course in advance. Therefore, in this process, if the government or relevant departments intervene in supervision, it can ensure that training institutions sell all courses, and after each class, training institutions can get the money they deserve. In this case, if parents are not satisfied with the intention of refunding fees in this process, they can also refund fees conveniently.
Third, strengthening the management of training institutions will help reduce the burden on parents. In fact, parents have a lot of burdens when educating their children. The emergence of training institutions is to use parents' anxiety to make money. Therefore, strengthening the management in this area can also reduce the financial burden of parents.