In fact, it is clear that the income of teachers in training institutions comes entirely from the tuition fees of students. Therefore, it is very certain that the higher the institutional fees, the higher the teacher's class pay, but don't expect this ratio to be balanced.

In other words, when the price of institutions rises by 50%, the class fees of teachers will not rise accordingly. With the development of people's emphasis on children's education, more and more people take money to join this industry. Many people just want to teach well at first, not make a profit. Making money is secondary. More importantly, it is good to let their three-inch platform shine and heat. Training institutions gave this opportunity, but it was accompanied by long-term continuous rotation.

In institutions with basic salaries, class wages are definitely lower. The higher the basic salary, the higher the teacher's class salary. Generally speaking, for institutions with a basic salary, the higher the basic salary, the more classes, the more inappropriate it is, because the proportion of teacher fees in the whole institution is almost the same, which is equivalent to taking the tuition fees of teachers with more classes to pay basic salaries to teachers with fewer classes; For institutions without basic salary, the more classes, the more total income, but for new teachers or teachers with fewer classes, it is not easy to insist.

For large head offices (profit-making organizations), the proportion of personalized teachers' income will generally be controlled between 33% and 35% (more than 35% of branch schools will generally lose money), and the proportion of head teachers' income will generally be controlled around 20%-25% (the profits of head offices mainly come from class projects, and personalized projects are mainly responsible for cash flow). Other institutions are varied, ranging from 40% to 50%. Part-time teachers in some small institutions may get 70% or even higher.