1. The factory was informed that there was a batch of goods to be delivered immediately, and the finished product warehouse of the factory was full, so they temporarily piled the goods at the door of the finished product warehouse to prepare for loading. The company stipulates that all finished products should be stored in controlled areas. Obviously, if the warehouse door is not well controlled, the finished product will be in danger of being stolen and damaged.

The factory thinks it doesn't matter to pile up at the door for a short time. In fact, this is not allowed. I deepened the training in the factory and told them that this is a serious problem to raise their awareness of protecting finished products.

I want to make some clarifications about this audit:

1. The factory was informed that a batch of goods would be shipped immediately; as

The finished product warehouse is full, so they put the goods in the warehouse.

Warehouse entrance, easy to load on the truck. The company stipulates that all

Finished products must be stored in a controlled area; Obviously, the entrance to the warehouse is

If it cannot be properly controlled, the finished product is in danger of being stolen.

Damaged.

Before I came to inspect the factory, I told the factory many times to put the raw materials in the raw material warehouse. In fact, they have put most of the raw materials in the warehouse, but two days before the factory inspection, they added a batch of plastic particles. They think that plastic particles don't have to worry about getting wet. The warehouses are full and workers put them in the aisles.

I think my training in the factory is not good enough. If these materials are left outside, they may be stolen or lost. Even if the plastic particles will not get wet, it will affect the product quality to some extent. Obviously, the factory's awareness in this respect is not enough, and they are lucky. I will train factory managers again to prevent this from happening again.

I once sent this program file to the factory, but they forgot to print it out. The mistake I made in my work was that I didn't review it again. I'm sorry. I will urge the factory to print this document and ensure that it is stamped with the controlled document.

2. Before the factory inspection, I have told the factory many times to store raw materials in the raw material warehouse; In fact, most of the raw materials are in the warehouse. But two days before the inspection, they bought a batch of plastic particles; they think

Plastic particles are not affected by moisture, and the warehouse is full, so they are placed in the aisle.

I concluded that my training was not good enough; The material placed in the open air may be

Stolen or lost, even if the plastic particles will not deteriorate due to moisture, the quality will be affected. There is obviously not enough awareness in this regard, and they have wishful thinking. I will train the factory managers again to prevent this from happening again.

I have sent this program file to the factory before, but they forgot to print it out; It was my fault that I didn't check it again, and I'm very sorry about it. I will prompt them to print out the document and make sure to stamp it as "controlled document".

When I checked this document before, I found that there was something wrong with the filing deadline stipulated in this document, so I asked the factory to revise it again, but their clerk only changed the figures manually to save labor, which was not allowed. The program file must be printed, not handwritten, so the auditor thinks this file is invalid.

I'm sorry I didn't re-examine this document. This is a terrible mistake. I will ask them to modify and print this program file again and check it again to make sure it is correct.

Some problems, such as weekly quality objectives and actual performance, training plans, inspection records, prenatal meetings, etc. If they are only partially unqualified or lack a training record, then the whole link they are involved in will be considered invalid, which I think is a bit unfair to the factory.

In addition, the auditor told us that Shanghai TCPS received a report that the factory produced children's products without audit, so he had to conduct a strict review of the factory.

I asked the factory, and they must answer me. They haven't made children's products before, and they won't in the future, and I didn't see any traces of making children's products at the scene. For this reason, we lost a lot of points.

When I checked this document, I found that there was something wrong with the submission date, so I

Require factory modification. But the clerk just corrected the number manually. This is not allowed, because the program file must be printed, not handwritten; So the auditor decided that the document was invalid.

I'm sorry for not reviewing this document; This is a mistake that should not be made.

Happen. I'll make sure they correct and print this document, and I'll check it again to make sure there are no mistakes.

There are some problems, such as weekly quality objectives and actual performance, training plan,

Inspection records, pre-production meetings, etc. Some of them only partially fail to meet the requirements or lack training records, but they are regarded as completely ineffective; I think it's unfair to plants.

In addition, the auditor told us that Shanghai TCPS had received a secret report from the factory.

Children's products are produced without audit, so they must implement strict

Inspection of plants. I asked the factory about this matter, and they replied positively that they had never produced children's products before and would never produce them in the future. In addition, I found that

There are no traces of children's products produced at the scene. However, we lost a lot of points for this.

English niurentuan