Candidates should be familiar with the contents of departmental laws and laws in combination with the judicial examination syllabus and designated teaching materials. Taking civil law as an example, the articles examined include general principles of civil law, guarantee law, contract law, marriage law, inheritance law, trademark law, patent law and copyright law. , as well as the relevant judicial interpretations of the laws of various departments (candidates can specify the specific examination scope from the judicial examination outline of that year).

From the content of the examination, we should not only understand the key content of each law, but also understand the vertical and horizontal relationship of the content stipulated in each law, such as what are the civil subjects stipulated in the civil laws of various ministries in China, and what are their characteristics and characteristics, so that the review effect is helpful to the three-dimensional knowledge. The author follows four "principles" in the first stage of review, as follows:

1. The starting point for reviewing the contents of the judicial examination is best arranged according to the score ratio of each department of law. For example, criminal law or civil law can be reviewed first;

2. As far as the review sequence is concerned, it is suggested to adopt the method of "substantive law+procedural law", such as "civil law+civil procedure law", "criminal law+criminal procedure law" and "administrative law+administrative procedure law". This review method can not only bridge the barriers between substantive law and procedural law, but also correspond to each other and promote memory and understanding.

3. Micro-trial refers to the review of laws of various departments. First of all, we should master the relevant theoretical knowledge in the designated teaching materials of judicial examination, then combine the legal and judicial interpretation, and finally study the real questions over the years and analyze the examination methods and test sites. Generally speaking, the test sites in the real questions over the years are "constant weight", that is, the repetition rate is very high. However, judging from the examination questions in 2004, the contents involved in the judicial examination tend to be comprehensive, so it will be biased to avoid a misunderstanding of reviewing only by the test sites over the years.

4. Review the knowledge points with heavy memory. Because of the law of memory and the function of intensive reading, it is impossible to have a long memory, so we should put this knowledge point with high memory back. Such as legal history, jurisprudence, public international law and so on.

In addition to the above four principles, the author suggests that candidates should not only rely on "eyes" and "brain" but also learn to use "hands", that is, they should be good at summing up. There are two reasons for adopting this method: first, it helps to remember, as the saying goes, "a good memory can't keep up with bad writing"; Second, because the designated textbooks for the judicial examination are very detailed, if the review at each stage is page by page and the outline is too simple, it is really a burden, so candidates should prepare their own "review books" to systematize the knowledge points involved. For example, you can specify the main systems included in the test center, what is the focus of each system, and what doubts are there, even including the "inspiration and sparks" that flashed during the review process. Maybe the first stage of review will feel a lot of work, but in the last stage, I believe it will have a significant effect with twice the effort.

(B) the "digestion" stage of knowledge

The first stage of review has laid a solid foundation, and the second stage will further consolidate knowledge and improve application ability on this basis. At this stage, it is suggested to adopt the method of comparative analysis to facilitate understanding and strengthen memory. For example, the comparative analysis between the three major procedural laws, the comparison of the rights and obligations of the parties at different stages of litigation and so on. In addition, it is necessary to analyze and compare the test sites over the years to see which ones are the "constant focus" of the judicial examination and which ones are not covered; We should also carefully study the problem-solving ideas and skills in answer analysis, especially the answers to case analysis questions and essay questions.

(C) the "absorption" stage of knowledge

This stage is the stage of checking for leaks and filling gaps. Candidates can choose one or two sets of high-quality simulation questions to practice and examine their practical application ability of knowledge. Supplement the knowledge that you have not mastered or have not mastered thoroughly, and strengthen important knowledge points.

Review at each stage should be biased. Because the content of judicial examination review is very complicated, it is impossible to cover everything, so we should focus on it. For example, laws with a large proportion of scores should be reviewed comprehensively, not only by key laws and history questions. However, some departmental laws (such as economic law) do not need to remember and understand all the rules, but can cope with the exam by knowing the test sites and key laws of real questions over the years. Special mention should be made here of the review of administrative law. On the one hand, the examination questions of administrative law are difficult, and on the other hand, the content of administrative law in the designated textbooks for judicial examination is not systematic, so it is best to take an undergraduate textbook as a reference to help you understand relevant knowledge. Finally, the author believes that in the review process, reading the law should not only stay at the literal level, but also analyze the legal spirit behind the law in order to truly grasp the knowledge points.

The above is the author's experience in the process of reviewing the college entrance examination, hoping to benefit the candidates. Keep a good attitude during the preparation period. I believe that Heaven rewards diligence and wish you good luck!

I still have a little feeling about the review method of civil law, that is, don't engage in "sea tactics". At present, a large number of published exam-oriented answers can undoubtedly be used as reference materials for candidates to review, but teachers always focus on the theoretical system and teaching points of civil law teaching when making questions. Therefore, doing questions can only be a way to master the questions and answering skills. If you fall into the sea of questions, you can only put the cart before the horse if you relax your grasp of basic concepts, basic systems and basic theories. On the contrary, if you master the basic concepts, basic systems and basic theories, no matter how the examination syllabus changes and what form the examiner uses to examine it, the so-called "staying in the same school" can strategize and win.

Using the famous teacher training class to give lectures has achieved remarkable results.