First of all, from the policy point of view, this kind of behavior should not be advocated, after all, it violates relevant laws and regulations. Because of national regulations, in-service teachers are not allowed to run classes in society, or to run classes in disguise, make up lessons, make up lessons, review, etc. And run classes by paying tuition. According to China's current policies and practices, in-service regular teachers are allowed to set up remedial classes on their own and charge fees within the scope of "bad conduct". It can be seen that the Ministry of Education explicitly prohibits teachers from running cram schools, but despite these policies, there are still many regular in-service teachers running cram schools, which is particularly prominent in some cities.
So what is the reason for this phenomenon? Judging from the reality, the most direct reason for this phenomenon is that the salary level of teachers is relatively low compared with other industries. The salary growth of teachers can't keep up with the growth of the overall consumption level of society and can't meet the needs of real life. Although teachers' salaries have been rising, they are far from enough. After deducting various expenses, teachers' monthly salary is very small, especially in some rural areas, where teachers' awareness of rights is relatively weak and there are few channels for obtaining information. In addition, the situation of male teachers is even worse than that of female teachers, which is the direct reason for the decrease in the number of male teachers. It is precisely because of these external economic factors that the number of cram schools has increased in recent years.
But should these growing cram schools be advocated? Let's analyze it first. I think teachers can run cram schools and achieve a win-win situation for teachers and students. Why not? Anyway, teachers don't run cram schools, and other institutions run cram schools, which also puts pressure on students. It is better to let their teachers make up lessons for their children during the holidays. But in the process of advocating teachers to run cram schools, there is actually a kind of alienation, which is terrible. Parents pay, but teachers fail to fulfill their due responsibilities and obligations when they have a holiday. After all, parents spend money to let their children study hard, not to "raise" teachers.
When teachers run cram schools during the holidays, some teachers are very enthusiastic when collecting money, but when it comes to formal classes, they complain privately and look forward to finishing classes a few days earlier. This kind of teacher is really hateful. Why don't you complain when collecting money? What makes people even more angry is that some teachers simply lead their children to play. After the holiday, no professor gave the students too much. You said it was irritating. People come to study, not to play. What do you mean by doing this? Isn't parents' money money Lead students to play, of course, students are willing, then you have never thought about the feelings of parents, trust is based on both sides.
I have heard of such a thing. In order to let students go to cram schools, some teachers don't learn all the knowledge that students should have in class, and they have to let their children go to cram schools run by teachers to teach them. I just want to vomit how such a teacher has such a big face. It's an insult to teachers' morality.
I think it is worth encouraging teachers to hold cram schools during holidays as long as the normal teaching order is not affected. I'm afraid some immoral teachers will put teachers at a more disadvantage.