Generally speaking, I personally feel that there is no special difficulty in English in these units, and there is no English interview, but graduate students must pass CET-6. I have a friend who is excellent, but his oral English is also very good, much better than mine. He can talk fluently in English, but he has not passed CET-6. As a result, these units can't be accommodating at all, and they can't pass the qualification examination. So unfortunately. Since you have passed CET-6, the basic requirements are enough, mainly depending on your academic qualifications and personal abilities, as well as written tests and interviews.
In fact, I think unless you want to go to a foreign company, English is just a qualification, and CET-6 is enough. There are really no other requirements. Of course, it is better if you pass BEC, but there are some conditions. But I don't think this condition is critical. It's like you took the judicial exam, the computer grade exam, the teacher qualification exam and so on. You said these things were useless, right? It is also a qualification, saying it is useful, and others have never asked for it. I'm not sure about other units, but my feeling is that these units basically have no requirements for English.
As for the relationship mentioned on the first floor, I don't think so. Of course, it's easier to have contacts. It doesn't matter, so I can't get in. Every year, so many people are recruited on campus, at least most of them are irrelevant fresh graduates. Social recruitment is eight immortals crossing the sea. However, campus recruitment is still quite competent. At least I didn't find a relationship, and the people around me didn't find a relationship. As for going in, the relationship is still more important. But that's another story. I can say it briefly. After all, some people's views are too one-sided and misleading.
Let's talk about moving first. Mobile is generally divided into written test and interview. There must be more than one interview. There may be some differences in different regions, but they are all the same. In the written test, there are differences between positions and professional topics, but the differences are really small, not as big as you think. It's not that you studied communication, the topics are all communication, and marketing is all finance. That's not true. Most of the topics are line tests, and the proportion of mathematics and intellectual graphics is greater than that of line tests, but the proportion of language and writing topics is smaller. Then there are about dozens of professional topics related to your major, but the proportion of topics is not too large, so comprehensive ability accounts for the largest proportion. I got the math and graphics questions correctly in the written test, so I didn't have time to do the application questions. But word problems are actually what I am good at. There are several rounds of interviews, which may be different from place to place. We met face to face three times, the first time at sea, the second time in groups, and the third time on one side. See eloquence and play, the specific methods can be checked, so I won't go into details.
Different banks have different words. Generally speaking, it is a written test and an interview. After the written test is passed, the interview will be notified. Some of them will be interviewed immediately after the written test. Finally, look at the comprehensive score. The written tests of banks are mostly comprehensive, with topics ranging from finance to computer and politics. It is comprehensive, depending on luck and knowledge. Of course, I have also come across specialized banking topics. For example, learning finance is a specialized financial topic, and learning computers is a specialized computer topic. It's just that the people recruited in this way are generally professional counterparts, such as studying computers, which are specially designed for you to take the computer test. If you go in, it's the information department in the bank. Maybe. Most of the recruitment of ordinary banks goes to branches, mostly starting with tellers. In this case, regardless of the major, everyone's work content is the same, and then we will look at personal ability in the work. As for which is better, that's different. If you want to make money, climb high, and be a president, you must start your business at the grassroots level. But it must be very tiring and stressful. Generally speaking, few people directly enter the bank, unless banks are in urgent need of certain talents. After entering in this way, their performance is mostly average, their income is good, and there is not so much pressure. But if they want to develop particularly well, it is very difficult and suitable for slow mixing.
That's about it. All of the above are hand-beaten, and I'm really tired. We can talk about it when we have a chance. I suggest you review your ability in the civil service examination. Many state-owned enterprises take these exams. Of course, if you go to the company, it must be related to your major, so you'd better review it and figure out what kind of job you want.
And now banks are moving these things, which is not as good as expected. It can be said that the income of mobile is only a little more than half of that of undergraduates 10 years ago. This gap is obvious enough. /kloc-how much was the price lower 0/0 years ago? At that time, undergraduates earned much more than graduate students now. In addition, there is not much room for mobile development, the administrative organization is very stable, and the middle-level cadres are not old, so they are mixed. And banks can be described as tragedies. Banks used to be good units. After China's entry into WTO, the competition is too great. In the past, banks were mostly planning, and the four major banks had their own businesses. It's different now. The bank's own products have no characteristics, and it is impossible to compete on the products. They all go out to pull business by themselves. It is very hard, and it is completely exposed like selling insurance and engaging in pyramid schemes. Although the income is acceptable, it is all hard money. It's stressful. Of course, if your personal ability is very outstanding, especially good at pulling business, the bank is definitely your first choice, because the stronger you are, the stronger your business ability, the higher your income and the higher your return. At the same time, it is also an industry with no future.
So LZ seems to be a stable state-owned enterprise, but it also reminds you that there are such problems in the banking and communication industries, which are really not as good as before. If you pursue stability, I actually recommend several industries to you. First of all, civil servants, civil servants in good units are not only stable, but also have good welfare. Even tomorrow, their income can be no less than that of banks, but the income of middle and high-level people is definitely not as high as that of middle and high-level, and the income of middle and high-level people is 200 thousand to 300 thousand or even higher. For example, it is not difficult for branch presidents to earn millions, but if civil servants are welfare-level cadres, their good units are only more than 654.38+ 10,000. It's just that the income of a good ordinary clerk in a unit may reach seven or eight thousand, which is equivalent to that of an ordinary clerk in a bank. But the work pressure and workload are definitely different.
Secondly, I suggest setting up some public institutions, such as the Planning Bureau, the National Development and Reform Commission, and landscape gardening design institutes, such as the Electric Power Design Institute and the Aerospace Design Institute. These institutions are mainly professional-related work, mainly research-oriented, and the income with good unit benefits is very considerable, even far exceeding that of banks, truly surpassing banks, and there is no business pressure. The main purpose is to improve personal professional ability, which is suitable for people who are good at professional learning and not particularly good at pulling business.
Then, it is recommended that colleges and universities have staffing positions, whether teaching or administration. Of course, the premise is that well-paid colleges and universities should have staffing or promise to solve the staffing within a few years. If colleges and universities have income and work units, it is even more important. Good units are paid more than banks. Moreover, the work in colleges and universities is easier, especially there are more opportunities for further study. If there is a project, the funds will be sufficient. It's just that most colleges and universities are definitely not as good as their previous units in terms of treatment, but good colleges and universities can still reach a high level. For example, one of my brothers is doing administrative work in a 985 school, and the unit is better, with an annual income of 6.5438+10,000. However, the usual work is basically repetitive work, and psychologically it is not like a bank, and there is no heavy burden. And there are winter and summer vacations, especially at school, which are highly praised by students. Teachers are called everywhere. If you are in a bank, you are a grandson unless you enter the middle and high level. Even the middle level is a grandson in front of the high level. But the school is better and the social atmosphere is not so strong.
I hope the above can help you. Have the opportunity to discuss and learn from each other again, hehe