Although the painting courses provided by training institutions can help children learn some skills and knowledge, I personally think that long-term participation in training institutions to learn painting is not necessarily the best choice. Here are some reasons:

Excessive pressure: Some training institutions will exert great learning pressure on children in order to achieve better teaching results. This may lead to children losing interest in learning and even psychological problems.

Restrict creativity: Training institutions usually teach cartography knowledge according to fixed courses and teaching methods. This way may limit children's creativity and imagination, so that they can't play their imagination and creativity freely.

Waste of resources: The courses in some training institutions are expensive and require a lot of time and energy. These resources may be wasted if children finally choose not to pursue a career related to painting.

Conflict with the school curriculum: the class hours of training institutions may conflict with the school curriculum, affecting children's performance in school. Moreover, if children attend too many training institutions, it may affect the study of other disciplines.

On the contrary, I think children can learn to draw through their hobbies. Parents can encourage their children to carry out painting activities at home, provide necessary materials and support, and also take their children to visit art galleries and exhibitions to cultivate their artistic accomplishment and aesthetic ability. This will allow children to develop their imagination and creativity freely, and at the same time, it will not give them too much learning pressure.