Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Which is better for civil servant exam training?
Which is better for civil servant exam training?
I remember that my decision to take the civil service exam was influenced by my relatives and classmates. Graduated from 20 14, and began to prepare for the civil service examination on 20 15. At that time, I searched a lot of preparation experience and learning institutions. After two years, I finally landed successfully today. I am the kind of person who has a solid learning foundation, and I have also gone through many detours, participated in civil service training courses, and some live classes.

1. Say "No!" Pass it to the class that passed the agreement.

Don't trust any protocol class. Those who can enroll in such classes are basically unscrupulous institutions.

First of all, "the agreement is covered, but the money is refunded" is just a gimmick to capture the speculative psychology of candidates-"I don't care about spending more money on the exam, and there is nothing to lose if I don't pass the exam."

Secondly, "overtime" is actually general training, focusing on closed training, but it is formal in form. In fact, the training contents are all the same review materials.

Third, "overtime" is a bet on the natural pass rate, making use of high training fees to earn probability money, which is a steady business.

In short, this kind of "waiting for the rabbit" that bypasses the agreement class should be resolutely abandoned, which not only encourages the wind of boasting huge profits in the industry, but also breeds the bad habit of fantasizing about taking shortcuts as civil servants in society.

At that time, I felt that it was not enough to study by myself, so I reported to a company's civil servant training class. Tuition 16800, but refund 13000. I said only for candidates with a certain foundation. I repeatedly stressed that my digital and data module foundation is poor before signing up. The teacher who signed up said it didn't matter. You can consult the training instructor and teach until you can. I didn't know until I went there. First of all, the conference room of 30 or 40 people was packed, which was basically the small class teaching promoted before, followed by cramming teaching for seven days and seven nights. I can't finish all the classes arranged every day, and I can't digest all the classes, especially the application, which requires a set of templates to copy books, and it has no effect at all.

Finally missed the interview.

2. A famous teacher in a big organization? Not necessarily!

Many people only pay attention to brands and report which one is famous. As we all know, you chose education and training instead of buying a mobile phone at the counter. Training lecturers is not produced by assembly line operation, and the training of a good lecturer takes three years, five years or even longer.

The so-called famous teachers in large institutions are also cursory, without continuity and planning. At that time, after the agreement class, there was no teacher.

3. A good teacher can not only lecture!

Let's not talk about training institutions, just say what is a "good teacher", at least a teacher with an "educational attitude".

In the training institution you attend, do all the teachers watch PPT by the book? Is it a book from beginning to end? A teacher like that is definitely a novice. No matter how big the organization is, there are tens of thousands of teachers, which is just a cloud. It depends on who is teaching you. Is it a teacher with no impetuous business atmosphere, no blind obedience and personal teaching style and characteristics? Both teachers in traditional classrooms and online teachers who can't really have face-to-face contact with students must have a correct "educational attitude" on the premise of ensuring teaching quality. The training teachers hatched in batches by training institutions that are eager for quick success and instant benefit basically have no "educational attitude".

Courses are all templated and routine, and it is not enough to get high marks.

4. The proportion of manual tutoring determines the degree of attention to you.

Everyone knows that the higher the degree of labor, the higher the value, so the price of offline training is much higher than online training. In addition to non-replicability, what is more important is the high cost of manual counseling.

In the same training institution, the higher the price of the course you choose, the greater the proportion of manual counseling. However, how to measure the degree of manual tutoring in different institutions and different courses depends on the participation of teachers.

For example, whether the teacher can answer your questions at any time is a specific problem analysis, not a cold machine or a standard reply from customer service. Discuss whether there is an exclusive one-on-one grading, so that the writing effect can rise in a virtuous circle.

In addition, webcasting classes can't keep communication and guidance, and teachers can't track your study plan and study status, so learning is also half the effort.

5. Choose the right learning method, get twice the result with half the effort.

Therefore, after 20 16 provincial examination, I thought for a long time and felt that I was still a little disorganized and needed targeted consolidation and study. At that time, through a period of screening, I found that there was a platform that was very suitable for me in terms of teaching design and cost performance. In the process of learning, the efforts, discussions and sharing of community partners gave me great motivation. Seeing that so many friends are working hard, why don't you work hard? At this time, I am completely like a student. The learning methods and thinking of the two teachers, Antelope and Huamujun, made me understand that learning is a process of avoiding arrogance and rashness rather than rushing for success.

According to the two teachers' study plans, after-class Q&A guidance and teacher Hua's application for correction, after several months of study, both subjects have been greatly improved.

By the time of the provincial examination in 20 17, I got a score of 152.9 in the written test, and the line test increased from 66. 1 to 80.5, and the application increased from 49.5 to 72, ranking first!

When I saw the report card, I was really shocked!

The public examination is a lonely journey of struggle, because everyone has different foundations and needs to break through different places. The civil service exam is not easy, but when we passed by, when we experienced all kinds of ups and downs, from soft to hard, looking back at ourselves, we really grew up and matured a lot. I don't deny that the public examination is lucky, but most people still need to rely on hard work and unremitting efforts. Choosing the right learning method and finding the right public examination training institution can get twice the result with half the effort, and the last thing you need to overcome is yourself.

By preparing for the exam for civil servants, we will learn a lot, and our knowledge of the exam, our ability to apply for writing and our understanding of the country's major policies will be greatly improved. I got a call from Grandpa Hua two days ago (very excited). Grandpa Hua said, looking back at the road I have traveled, I am actually changing, becoming not the ability to learn, but the way of thinking.

So, little friends, stick to it. Although it is painful now, please believe that your life will be better after this painful transformation.