(A) the educational thinking is incorrect, which can not reflect the comprehensiveness of its work.

(1) As far as guiding ideology is concerned, it still stays in the stage of exam-oriented education, and the idea of one-sided pursuit of enrollment rate is deeply rooted, which can not really achieve the educational goal of all-round development, so that the trained students can not meet the needs of modern social life and fierce competition in the future world.

(2) Knowledge is more important than creativity in training objectives; It values wisdom over morality and takes scores as the only criterion for evaluating students. There is a general one-sided view that "obedience" and "honesty" are good ideas for students, which makes the trained students content with the status quo, stick to the old ways and have a narrow vision, and cannot adapt to the requirements of the times for talents.

(B) improper educational methods, unable to reflect the creativity of his works.

(1) To instill pure book knowledge into students, we can't stand on the height of historical mission and social responsibility and educate students with a forward-looking vision, so that students can't establish a sense of survival and competition from an early age, and they lack humanity and responsibility.

(2) Passive control of students, completely positioning students as managed roles, ignoring students' dominant position, class work is completely decided by the class teacher, and students only obey and execute unconditionally, which suppresses students' sense of participation and autonomy, resulting in tension between teachers and students, thus creating a group centrifugal effect, which is not conducive to the healthy growth of primary and secondary school students. (3) Students only pay attention to individual learning, with little or no cooperative learning. In most cases, cooperation is a mere formality, which makes students lack cooperation consciousness and ability, let alone the cultivation of innovative spirit and practical ability, which is not conducive to the improvement of students' comprehensive quality.

(4) unfair to students, especially when using incentive strategies, "encouraging the superior and belittling the inferior", resulting in psychological imbalance of most students, which in turn leads to resistance. In the long run, there will be "small gangs" and "small groups" in the class, which will make the class management work unable to be carried out smoothly.

(5) Educating students by unified syllabus, unified teaching materials and unified examination, ignoring students' individual differences, makes students become simple "memory storers of knowledge", hinders the cultivation of students' personality and innovative ability, and can not adapt to the future highly competitive, flexible and changeable modern society.

(6) We can't cultivate students' comprehensive quality, especially we can't use all kinds of hidden media to manage students psychologically, and cultivate students' good moral quality, psychological quality and modern consciousness.

(7) In the face of the high standard requirements for talents in the new century, it is impossible to establish an effective management platform for class management by using network resources, which makes the management work more "blocked" and less "traction".