First, the video clip class. After scanning the code for a video editing training class, I entered a WeChat group with about 150 people. This group has content sent by the course manager, advocating various "cash games". The live course belongs to a bishop who claims to have 20 million fans. In addition to briefly introducing the recommendation rules of some video platforms, he spent most of his time "showing" his achievements in selling goods through the platform, claiming that "the minimum daily income is 19,000".
At the end of the course, the "lecturer" said that 15 students could be taught "one-on-one", which not only taught them various cash-out skills, but also promised that if the students worked full-time, their monthly income would be no less than 100000 yuan from the second month, but they would have to pay the course fee of 2990 yuan. Some students paid the money.
In an editing training class, "lecturers" mainly advocate part-time jobs to make money.
Second, the short video platform content processing class. There are such advertisements on many social platform accounts, claiming that "you don't need to know English, you don't need to know how to shoot clips. As long as you master the rules of" processing "and" carry "the videos released by domestic short video platforms to overseas versions, you can wait for" traffic realization "to make a lot of money.
Third, "learning' psychological listener' can not only get a professional certificate, but also make money part-time." In order to persuade students to pay for classes, the staff of a training institution has repeatedly stressed that certificates will be issued after training, and the institution will also "send orders" to students to earn money part-time. However, when students asked about "what certificate" and the frequency and method of part-time "dispatch", the staff member was vague. Other trainings such as "dubbing implementation" and "data analyst" also have the problem of being misnamed.
Many job seekers have participated in this kind of training course, and more than 1000 members have participated in many live online classes. Many of them are anxious to find jobs or are currently having a bad job search.
The network "sideline training trap" has many routines and is dangerous.
The network "sideline training trap" has some distinct "routines".
First, most of them are "1 yuan tuition", "0 yuan tuition" and "can make a lot of money", and then they frequently send messages and make phone calls to induce students to buy courses at high prices. The cost of related courses ranges from several thousand yuan to several hundred thousand yuan.
Second, training institutions often "promise" that students can recommend or "send orders" to provide part-time money-making opportunities after paying high tuition fees to buy courses. However, students found that most of these promises could not be fulfilled at all. "I promised to earn my tuition back in 20 days, and now I have not fulfilled it in 40 days." A student in a short video editing class said. Many experts from the Institute of Psychology of Chinese Academy of Sciences said that they had never heard of the profession of psychological listener.
Training the so-called "psychological listener" position at high cost.
Third, the training effect is not worthy of the name and the quality is poor. According to many students, some training lecturers give very shallow lectures, or even paste them from the internet, which has almost no practical value; Some training lecturers let students spend hundreds of dollars to buy dubbing software to make video explanations, but they can't release them; There is also a training course on lecturer identity fraud. The reporter contacted a well-known film and television blogger, who is said to teach editing courses. He said, "Someone on the Internet impersonated me to sell classes.".
Faced with such a trap, once the students are recruited, their legitimate rights and interests are often not guaranteed. The reporter searched a number of online complaint platforms and found that there were hundreds of complaints against the above-mentioned institutions, most of which were "non-refundable".
In addition, a large number of "students" are also facing great risks of being targeted by criminals involved in fraud.