The first is to expand the regulatory vision and choose the regulatory focus. First, implement efficiency monitoring around the central task of the government. We should proceed from the overall situation of government work, correctly grasp the development direction of government effectiveness supervision, think about what the government thinks, be anxious about what the government is anxious about, and closely focus on the central work of the government, especially the task of economic construction. It is necessary to combine major government decisions, resolutions and decisions, carry out targeted efficiency monitoring, promptly handle and correct administrative violations that hinder the implementation of government decisions, resolutions and decisions, especially correct and deal with wrong behaviors that hinder and interfere with economic development, so as to accelerate economic development, optimize development environment, improve administrative efficiency and ensure the smooth completion of government tasks. The second is to highlight the efficiency supervision of key industries, key departments and key projects. To supervise the administrative efficiency of special funds, administrative examination and approval, construction and other key departments and key links; Focus on supervising the administrative efficiency of project approval, index approval, personnel approval and other departments, as well as the operation of power, financial power and human rights; Supervise the administrative efficiency of the administrative departments that directly affect the local economic development. Third, the problems strongly reflected by the masses are the focus of efficiency supervision. Solving the problems strongly reflected by the masses is a concrete manifestation of the discipline inspection and supervision organs practicing Theory of Three Represents and safeguarding the fundamental interests of the people. Therefore, it is necessary to give full play to the role of the administrative efficiency complaint center, specifically accept complaints from the masses about administrative efficiency, deal with the problems reflected by the masses in a timely manner, and take the departments or services strongly reflected by the masses as the key administrative efficiency monitoring objects to ensure the satisfaction of the masses and close the relationship between the party and the masses. Second, improve supervision methods and broaden supervision channels. Any work should pay attention to methods, and scientific and flexible methods can get twice the result with half the effort. Therefore, in order to make the administrative efficiency supervision work fruitful, we must constantly improve the supervision methods in practice. First of all, we should be good at organically integrating administrative efficiency supervision with other related work, so as to promote each other and complement each other. For example, it is combined with the construction of institutional style. Because of similar requirements and consistent goals, the style construction and administrative efficiency supervision of government agencies. Therefore, we can combine the two to participate in the supervision of the work style of government departments in the form of administrative efficiency supervision, urge government departments and their civil servants to improve their work style, correct and deal with the problems exposed in social services, and make the work system and work discipline of the organs be well implemented. It can be combined with deepening the reform of administrative examination and approval system and accelerating the construction of standardized service-oriented government. Make full use of administrative efficiency monitoring means, promote the reform of administrative examination and approval system, simplify procedures, actively promote the openness of government affairs, speed up the construction of e-government, and improve the government performance evaluation system. Implement "one-stop", "one-window" and "accreditation service hall" and other efficient and efficient office services. It should be combined with source management. Many administrative departments do not act, act indiscriminately, make decrees unreasonable, are inefficient, and often correct mistakes, so they relapse. One of the key reasons is that the combination of efficiency supervision and source governance is not close, and the height, breadth and depth of governance are not enough. Therefore, we must put the root of the problem on administrative efficiency supervision, constantly increase the intensity of treating both the symptoms and the root causes, and improve the effect of administrative efficiency supervision. Secondly, we should gradually establish a set of scientific efficiency monitoring operation mechanism. First, the independent mechanism enables the regulatory authorities to take the initiative to intervene in advance when monitoring major issues, and exercise their power and investigate and deal with problems relatively independently; The second is to participate in the mechanism, absorb experts to participate in the work, and make up for the lack of professional knowledge of some supervision projects by supervisors; Third, the open mechanism, through appropriate channels, will be monitored by the object and its monitoring matters to the public; Fourth, the complaint mechanism, the establishment of administrative efficiency monitoring complaint center, to accept complaints from all walks of life. Broadening supervision channels and giving full play to the role of social supervision are also effective measures to strengthen administrative efficiency supervision and improve supervision effect. Because the people are the main body and fundamental force of building a clean government, we should attach great importance to giving full play to the supervisory role of the people, closely combine administrative efficiency supervision with social supervision, constantly broaden the channels of supervision, and enhance the effectiveness of supervision over administrative organs and civil servants. The first is to play the role of openness in government affairs. We will comprehensively promote the openness of government affairs, strengthen supervision, make it frequent, truly and fully open, and ensure the people to exercise their right to know, participate and supervise according to law. The second is to play the role of invited inspectors. Hire a group of members of democratic parties and personages without party affiliation with good political quality, high enthusiasm for participating in politics, wide representation and great social influence as special inspectors, and by participating in various special inspections and law enforcement supervision organized by supervisory organs, double supervise the performance of duties of the monitored objects and the implementation of discipline by supervisory organs, so as to correct unhealthy trends in departments and industries. The third is to play the role of professional ethics evaluation. To carry out professional ethics evaluation activities in an all-round way, the evaluation content should be continuously expanded, not only to evaluate the service quality and efficiency, but also to evaluate the level of law enforcement and clean government. Focus on evaluating the expenditure and use of funds, material procurement, cadre appointment and employment arrangements that the masses care about. For the "window" behavior, the focus is on whether its procedures are simple, fast, open and transparent, whether the service commitment is fulfilled, and how the staff's service attitude, work ability and efficiency are. For law enforcement departments, it is important to evaluate whether law enforcement personnel are honest and self-disciplined, administer according to law and act impartially. Third, improve the supervision system and strengthen the supervision team. Administrative efficiency supervision is a work with strong policy. It is necessary to establish a series of rules and regulations to standardize and constantly innovate in system construction. First of all, it is necessary to stipulate the quality requirements of administrative activities of administrative organs and provide operational standards for administrative efficiency supervision. For example, the Code of Conduct for Civil Servants generally stipulates the obligations that civil servants of this organ should perform, the disciplines that they should abide by, and the corresponding legal and administrative responsibilities; Post responsibility system, classified according to posts and categories, links the positions, powers, responsibilities and interests of civil servants; There are also service commitment system, target responsibility system, open government affairs system and accountability system. Secondly, the supervisory organs should establish and improve the administrative efficiency supervision system, such as the methods of rewards and punishments, the methods of checking the results of efficiency supervision, the procedural rules of efficiency complaints, and the methods of investigating the responsibility for dereliction of duty, so as to institutionalize and standardize the administrative efficiency supervision and provide a legal basis for carrying out the administrative efficiency supervision. To carry out administrative efficiency supervision, we should not only have system guarantee, but also have talent guarantee. Because a good system depends on people to improve it and people to supervise its implementation. Therefore, to improve the level of administrative efficiency supervision, we must build a high-quality supervision team. First of all, we should update our concepts and enhance our awareness of supervision according to law. Supervision cadres should carry out regular ideological education, strengthen the study of the Administrative Supervision Law, eliminate the vague understanding of the legal nature of supervision work, eliminate the wrong concept of equating supervision work with discipline, and eliminate the wrong behavior of acting according to experience and ignoring legal procedures. Strengthen the awareness of supervision and law enforcement and supervision according to law, and strengthen the supervision and verification of the supervised objects in strict accordance with the supervision authority. Secondly, we should improve our work style and work efficiency. Supervision cadres themselves should constantly strengthen the construction of work style, earnestly improve their work style, and strive to improve work efficiency and effectiveness. Only in this way can the administrative efficiency supervision work be carried out better. It is necessary to strengthen training, improve professional ability, organize regular training for supervisory cadres, constantly broaden their knowledge and improve their knowledge structure, so that they can be familiar with politics, laws and regulations, understand economy and management, and master and use modern new scientific and technological means to carry out administrative efficiency supervision. In terms of training methods, we can learn from superior business departments or relevant colleges and universities to improve the ability and quality of supervision cadres. In the management of supervision cadres, it is necessary to establish a system of survival of the fittest, so that supervision cadres who are difficult to do their jobs can quit the supervision team.