No, the Education Bureau clearly stipulates that in-service teachers can't make up lessons for students privately during holidays, which means they can't make up lessons in summer vacation. However, in many places, teachers in public schools still pull students to make up lessons during holidays. If they want to do it, it is suggested not to do it in their own name, but in the name of their family or friends, so as to avoid some problems.

First, in-service teachers hold cram schools and extra-long classes for free, which violates the education law.

Article 27 of the Education Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the establishment, alteration and termination of schools and other educational institutions shall go through the formalities of examination and approval, registration or filing in accordance with relevant state regulations. In other words, any unit or individual holding cram schools, extra-long classes or other forms of educational institutions must obtain the approval of the local education administrative department. Otherwise, it is illegal to run a school. Article 75 of the Education Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the establishment of schools and other educational institutions in violation of relevant state regulations shall be revoked by the education administrative department; Illegal income, confiscate the illegal income; The directly responsible person in charge and other direct personnel shall be given administrative sanctions according to law. According to the past situation, all in-service teachers used the winter and summer vacations to run classes without the approval of the Education Bureau, because teachers have the right to rest and participate in training, and these rights of teachers should be safeguarded during holidays. Therefore, it is basically illegal for in-service teachers to use holidays to run classes, which should be strictly prohibited. What has been done should be banned. Very few teachers defend illegal classes, saying: this is after-class tutoring and a continuation of normal teaching. If so, teachers should not charge fees under any pretext, and their selfless dedication should be praised. In fact, the real motivation for teachers to run classes is the "charge" behind running classes.

Education is a public welfare undertaking. An important principle for the state to formulate educational laws and regulations is that running schools should not be for profit. Article 25 of the Education Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the state encourages enterprises, institutions, social organizations, other social organizations and individual citizens to establish schools and other educational institutions according to law. No organization or individual may establish schools or other educational institutions for profit. On-the-job teachers are paid by the state whether they are in school or during holidays. Moreover, the state stipulates that teachers' salaries are not lower than those of local civil servants. The treatment of teachers has been greatly improved at present and will continue to be improved in the future. In-service teachers run classes with compensation, which violates the principle of educational public welfare and the principle that running schools should not be for profit. Teachers should set an example of social morality and law-abiding, and the illegal acts of paid tutoring and paid remedial classes must be corrected.

Second, in-service teachers hold cram schools and extra-long classes for free, which violates the "six teachers' ethics."

In 2008, the Ministry of Education and the National Committee of China Education, Culture, Health and Sports Trade Union jointly issued the newly revised Code of Professional Ethics for Primary and Secondary School Teachers, namely "Six New Teachers' Ethics". The general requirements of the "six new teachers' ethics" are: patriotism, law-abiding, dedication, caring for students, teaching and educating people, being a teacher and lifelong learning. In the specific content of "being a teacher by example", it is clearly stipulated that (teachers) should consciously resist paid tutoring and not take advantage of their positions to seek personal gain. In-service teachers hold paid cram schools and extra-long classes, and carry out paid tutoring activities in disguise, which violates the "six teachers' ethics for new teachers" and defiles the moral image of teachers.

First, Articles 1 and 2 of the "Six Articles of New Teachers' Ethics" clearly stipulate that teachers should be patriotic and law-abiding, and love their posts and dedication. This requires teachers to abide by national laws and regulations, to love education, to be indifferent to fame and fortune, and to make selfless contributions. Paid tutoring violates the relevant provisions of the Education Law and the basic requirements of teachers' professional ethics. Second, Articles 3 and 4 of the "Six New Teachers' Ethics" clearly stipulate that teachers should care about students and teach and educate people. This requires teachers to care for every student unconditionally and make efforts for all students and their all-round development. Teachers are required not only to cultivate students with knowledge and ability, but also to educate students with exemplary behavior and personality charm. Paid tutoring is easy for teachers to have "power eyes and eccentric eyes". Once teachers are contaminated with "copper stink", their personality charm will inevitably be discounted in the eyes of students, which will have a negative impact on the formation of students' outlook on life, world outlook and values. Therefore, paid tutoring deviates from the core of teachers' morality of loving students and teaching and educating people; Third, Article 5 of "Six Articles of New Teachers' Morality" clearly stipulates that a teacher should be a teacher by example, consciously resist paid tutoring, and may not seek personal gain by taking advantage of his position. Paid tutoring has alienated the relationship between teachers and students, alienated the pure and normal relationship between teachers and students into "employment relationship", "interest relationship" and "money relationship", and distorted the personality power of teachers to set an example. Fourth, paid tutors fall into the cycle of "inferior compensation", which damages the reputation of the school. Paid tutoring for in-service teachers originated from a small number of teachers in schools. Most teachers profit from violating discipline, their interests are unbalanced and their psychology is unbalanced, which leads to a chain reaction. Finally, there is the situation of "you make up for me". More and more students take part in paid remedial classes. Teachers focus on making up lessons after class, distracting their normal class energy, leading to a mountain of comments and opinions from parents, which will inevitably hurt the reputation of the school. Fifth, paid tutoring affects the unity among teachers, leading to the decline of team spirit and team consciousness. The quality of a school depends on the school spirit; The spirit of a school depends on its team spirit. Modern education shows that it is absolutely impossible to run a school, manage a class and educate a student only by relying on individual teachers and a few teachers. Only by relying on the strength of all teachers can we succeed. Paid tutoring often happens to teachers in some major subjects in schools, which often causes dissatisfaction among some auxiliary teachers who are difficult to carry out tutoring. If it cannot be solved in time, it is easy to form a situation of "uncooperative, unsupported, disunited and disharmonious" among teachers. Once such a situation is formed, the school spirit will collapse, and the school will not be far from collapse.

To sum up, it is illegal for in-service teachers to run classes, make up lessons and tutor with pay, which is detrimental to the image of the school collective and teachers and contrary to the original intention of education. All teachers should be educated to resist consciously, and any misunderstanding and behavior should be resolutely corrected.