The first part is humanities education.

The second part is the education of things (that is, the education of nature)

People's education can be divided into public education and natural education.

Natural education (that is, family education) is called natural education because human beings have produced this kind of natural education since birth, and mothers will take the initiative to educate their children. The main content of this part of education is human morality and ability.

Public education came into being only after the development of human survival ability to a certain extent, with the emphasis on knowledge education.

See Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments and Rousseau's Emile.

The ultimate goal of education is to cultivate students' habits from an early age, so that they can become people with good character and benefit to society when they grow up, which is a by-product of knowledge education. See the chapter on education in Bacon's essays.

At the same time, Levitt also pointed out that teachers' duty is to set an example and convey beneficial values to students, and emphasized that teachers set an example and convey beneficial values to students, which is the most important part of human education.

Pay attention to the debate: although according to Rousseau, Adam Smith and others, personality education is much more important than knowledge training, pay attention to your argument that personality training is more than knowledge training, and remember that there is more than that, so there will be some room for manoeuvre.

I hate debating this kind of thing anyway. Whether you can call heaven a hell depends on you.

Moreover, this debate is bad and full of loopholes. Obviously, personality training is more important than knowledge training. You can give as many examples as you want. We can argue it out.