Refuting the thesis is mainly to express opinions on certain events or problems, refute one-sided, wrong or even reactionary views or propositions, and thus show their correct views and propositions. Generally speaking, a rebuttal is a broken article, that is, while refuting the wrong argument of the other party, it puts forward its own correct point of view in a tit-for-tat manner. Therefore, we say that its basic structure is "breaking before standing".
The whole idea of refutation is "cleverly set the negative side and refute it layer by layer". "Cleverly set the negative side" is to put forward possible negative views on the basis of positive discussion, and try to preset and set them all as much as possible to reflect the thoroughness of your thinking; "Layer upon layer counter-argument" refers to refuting the preset counter-argument with theoretical arguments and factual arguments, from its superficial mistakes to its deep ideological roots, making it untenable, thus making its own views reasonable and powerful.
The writing mode of refuting papers is mainly divided into three steps:
The first step is to "set the goal": put forward the enemy's point of view (list the wrong facts)
The second step is analysis: hazard analysis.
The third step is to uncover the essence: analyze the essence of error.