Generally speaking, the scoring criteria for summary questions, analysis questions and countermeasures questions focus on two aspects:

First, whether the "score" is complete or not is the main basis of the scoring standard.

Second, the requirements for language expression and neatness of papers, fluent sentences, use of punctuation marks, clear handwriting, typos and words.

According to the above two aspects, examination papers are generally divided into four categories.

A kind of test paper, with complete marks, fluent language, neat paper, fluent sentences, correct punctuation, clear handwriting and no typos, meets the requirements. The score is between 16 and 20. It can also be divided into an upper layer and a lower layer.

The main points of the second-class examination paper are basically complete, but the expression is slightly insufficient. The language is fluent, the volume has not changed obviously, there are no obvious problems with punctuation marks, there are some typos, and the number of words does not meet the requirements (multiple words or insufficient). The score is between 1 1 ~ 15. It can also be divided into upper and lower categories.

The main points of the three types of papers are obviously insufficient, the language is not fluent, the paper surface changes greatly, there are many typos, punctuation marks are single, and the words are few, and the scores are between 6 ~ 10. It can be divided into upper and lower categories.

Four kinds of papers, the answer is wrong, off topic, or only particularly simple content, the score is between 0 and 5.

2, composition scoring standards

As far as composition is concerned, marking is generally based on grading standards, combined with relevant sample papers, and the method of overall observation and grading is adopted to mark papers. The operation of marking papers can be divided into the following steps: ① reading as a whole; (2) determine the class; (3) Grading scores according to the benchmark scores of the same class. As long as the candidates' answers meet the requirements, the structure is clear, the concept is clear, the language is fluent and the analysis is reasonable, they can be given points as appropriate.

In recent years, the focus of composition grading is mainly reflected in the conception or viewpoint, the degree of material combination, structural level, language expression, and the cleanliness of the paper.

A type of text: completely meets the requirements for answering questions.

The center (writing angle, central argument, theme idea) is clear, and it is demonstrated and explained closely with specific examples in the given materials, and the language is fluent and clear.

Divide 38 into datum points and float appropriately. Those who basically meet the above conditions can get benchmark scores; Appropriate bonus points that are more prominent in one aspect; On the contrary, reduce points as appropriate. Score 36 to 40 points.

Four types of texts: completely inconsistent with the requirements for answering questions.

The article has nothing to do with the topic, so it can't find the center of the article (writing angle, central argument, theme idea), and it can't be demonstrated and explained with specific examples in the given materials; The structure is chaotic, the organization is unclear, the language is unreasonable, and I don't know what to say; Piece together information and copy and plagiarize the given information purely; The whole article is divided into items, similar to an outline; This composition is incomplete and unfinished.

Matters needing attention in marking papers: ① If it is less than 700 words, it will be judged below level 3; (2) The full text is scrawled and illegible, and scores below Grade 4 are given; (3) If the title is not written or other titles (excluding subheadings) are drawn up, 3 points will be deducted. Three typos are deducted 1 minute.

In addition, the combination of information is not to copy information and list information, but to have an appropriate proportion of information and opinions. Only opinions can be three types of volumes;

Combined with data but not completely combined, data analysis is rare, which belongs to the second volume; The data analysis is sufficient, the viewpoint is clear, and the discussion is powerful, which belongs to a volume.