In my limited life memory, I have only heard that the eagle catches the chicken and the eagle catches the turtle. This is the first time in my life. Therefore, when I read this composition material for the college entrance examination in Guizhou Province in 2008, curiosity drove me to make up my mind to complete a spiritual journey about turtles and eagles, which seemed logical. I want to discuss the desires of three different characters, namely, tortoise, man and eagle, and the relationship between them. I believe that the results of the analysis will give you some enlightenment, and become another experience or law retained in our memory to guide our behavior, so that our limited life will no longer have shortcomings.
The first thing I want to say is whether this story will still make us curious if it is not a turtle but a chicken or some other character. The answer is no, changing other animals, such as chickens, will only enhance the fierce nature of the eagle and make its role more arrogant. If the story is designed in this way, then the following things will stop here, and its profound ideological content will be scattered with the wind. Of course, we don't need to discuss this story together today. So I think, the designer put the turtle in this story, there must be other intentions. After some thinking, I finally understand that turtles are assembled, which means that choosing turtles will set off the end of the story.
Secondly, the key link of this story lies in the kind people. When he saw the eagle trying to catch the turtle, he bravely drove the eagle away and escorted the turtle back to the sea. As everyone knows, the appearance and behavior of this middleman innocently implicated more turtles, which led to the attack of the turtle team and became the accomplice of the hawks' desire satisfaction. From another point of view, without this person, logically speaking, this little turtle, who is also a reconnaissance turtle, may inform his companions of the situation on the shore in time and decide whether to go out collectively, thus avoiding the tragic incident of collective turtle catching later.
Regrettably, an accidental behavior of human beings seems to be full of love and responsibility, and it is considered to be helping animals regain their lives. In fact, this kind of behavior, which is only carried out according to personal wishes or life logic, is often contrary to reality, because any animal circle has its established rules. Just like the above story, people's rescue behavior seems ordinary, but in essence it seriously undermines an organized and planned action of turtles, and even causes them to be killed.
From this, I thought of the environmental world in which we live. It is particularly important to talk about harmony and environmental protection, how to deal with the relationship between human beings and surrounding things such as animals and plants, know the roles and respect them according to their habits, and understand them deeply. Otherwise, when you see the little turtle threatened, you will instinctively rescue it, regardless of the consequences, and finally turn the comedy into a tragedy.
This may also be a textbook of great practical significance to education. Teaching students in accordance with their aptitude and caring for their children is a truth that every parent and teacher knows. However, in real life, some of our parents simply think that their children are too tired, too bitter and too young to do so as soon as they see their children coming out to participate in voluntary labor organized by the community. I thought it was caring about the behavior of sending children home, but I thought it was caring about and loving children. In fact, it is to let children lose the most critical and important part of their lives, that is, to comfort their hearts with their hands! Are there many such opportunities in their life experiences? The answer is also no, because your intervention, children lost the opportunity to experience society and understand society. Isn't this price serious enough?
I remember when I first learned to write, a young writer named Yu Hua once said: Once experience is only responsible for practical things, it is getting farther and farther away from the essence of the spirit, so it is inevitable to misinterpret the true meaning. The story of the tortoise, the man and the eagle may continue, and there may be many versions of the plot between them, but the moral of the truth is likely to make people naturally react to filth like garbage on a street, instead of thinking from another angle, so that our spirit will be farther and farther away from the world in which we all live. When we do something, can we first think about what will happen if I do this? Who am I responsible for? What would be the more real situation? Only think twice before you act, our behavior will be more real. Only in this way can we be worthy of the word "responsibility". I hope there will be no such tragedy in my writing!